There is no counterpoint to a false and baseless accusation. It’s like trying to prove a negative. In my opinion the caucus examined a bill, falsly purported to be a repeal, to which they had no part in design, and found they could not support it. No negotiation ever took place because the bill never even approached being a repeal. It was a pig in poke. It was a no sale.
So in other words, you’ve got nothing to offer but to try to change the subject.
Sorry, but no matter your opinions on the Ryancare bill, it is STILL negotiating in bad faith to pretend to support a bill one day, only to suddenly call back with more demands out of the blue.
Do you have an answer to that?
I doubt it; if you did, you would have posted it already.
Sorry buddy, but the HFC is not as pure as the driven snow like you seem to want to believe. They got what they wanted, but they used underhanded tactics to do it. It’s up to you to decide whether it was worth it.