Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

Helpful.

For me the question is whether the Leadership started the ‘nasty’ by excluding Freedom Caucus from writing the bill.
Or whether the Freedom Caucus started the ‘nasty’ by refusing to participate in it’s writing.

Whichever it is should change.

***

Could be both. The HFC and the establishment were dealing with each other as much as they were dealing with Trump. Three different factions. Four if you count the petulant Demobrats.


120 posted on 03/30/2017 7:38:33 PM PDT by Luircin (Dancing in the streets! Time to DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Luircin

But it’s key.
Starting the ‘gaming’ after the bill was written is pointless.
That seems to be how Trump is looking at it, but his shots at the HFC may be of a more general nature.
(Frankly, I just don’t believe he’s that foolish.)

Or, the HFC refused an offer to participate in the original drafting- in which case they were foolish (and ‘nasty’).


122 posted on 03/30/2017 8:03:25 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson