1 posted on
05/19/2017 9:59:26 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Dark matter is matter traveling faster than the speed of light.
you’re welcome.
2 posted on
05/19/2017 10:02:15 AM PDT by
Eddie01
To: BenLurkin
perhaps there is more matter than meets the eye, matter that we cannot see, dark matterPerhaps there is. Perhaps there isn't.
The state of the evidence is such that using the term "denies" is very concerning - it's the job of investigators to relentlessly attack unproven hypotheticals. That's not denial - that's science.
3 posted on
05/19/2017 10:03:00 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Die Gedanken sind Frei)
To: BenLurkin
So, if you can’t explain something, just say it’s because of Dark Matter.
“Sir, you were doing 50 in a 25 zone.”
“That may be so, Officer, but it’s because of Dark Matter!”
Or
“These aren’t my underwear! Where did they come from?”
“Those are from Dark Matter, honey.”
6 posted on
05/19/2017 10:15:11 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: BenLurkin
Thanks for posting!
Mentally (and emotionally) I’ve tended to lump Dark Matter/Dark Energy in with Multiverse Theory - ‘Fudge Factors’ like Einstein’s ‘Cosmological Constant’.
Too bad I didn’t know about the Cosmological Constant back in the 10th grade when I couldn’t get my Geometry Theorems to work out properly!
MOND looks interesting - have to do a bid of reading up on it.
Thanks again!
8 posted on
05/19/2017 10:23:49 AM PDT by
BwanaNdege
("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
To: BenLurkin
Nice article, well written, good post.
10 posted on
05/19/2017 10:27:11 AM PDT by
expat2
To: BenLurkin
Oh, dark matter. That’s the stuff that an equation says -must- exist and must be MOST of the universe. We look for it and cant find it. We cant see it, locate it, or describe it. It simply isn’t there. So instead of wondering if the science behind the equation is wrong... we conclude its invisible.
And that folks, is physics today.
It would be like having a educated guess that your friend is standing by third base in Yankee Stadium. You go there and cannot find him. Instead of going back over the clues that made you think he was there, you conclude he is invisible. You angrily berate anyone who tells you he isn’t there.
13 posted on
05/19/2017 10:38:51 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
To: BenLurkin
15 posted on
05/19/2017 10:42:21 AM PDT by
xp38
To: BenLurkin
I've long thought that the theories surrounding 'dark' matter and energy were just handwaving by physicists and astronomers who were unwilling to utter the phrase "we don't know". I think what is much more likely than some mysterious 'dark' matter that can't be seen, is that there is something fundamental that our modern theories of cosmology are overlooking.
16 posted on
05/19/2017 10:44:17 AM PDT by
zeugma
(The Brownshirts have taken over American Universities.)
To: BenLurkin
Dark Matter / Dark Energy theory is akin to ...
1 + 2 + god particle + something else / another thing = 12
In other words, junk.
18 posted on
05/19/2017 11:02:34 AM PDT by
SolidRedState
(I used to think bizarro world was a fiction.)
To: BenLurkin
What struck me was some regularity in the anomaly. The rotational velocities were not just larger than expected, they became constant with radius. Why? Sure, if there was dark matter, the speed of stars would be greater, but the rotation curves, meaning the rotational speed drawn as a function of the radius, could still go up and down depending on its distribution.
But they didn’t. That really struck me as odd. So, in 1980, I went on my Sabbatical in the Institute for Advance Studies in Princeton with the following hunch: If the rotational speeds are constant, then perhaps we’re looking at a new law of nature. If Newtonian physics can’t predict the fixed curves, perhaps we should fix Newton, instead of making up a whole new class of matter just to fit our measurements.
The above is the key to this whole thing. I don't think the dark matter folks can really explain the regularity.
19 posted on
05/19/2017 11:03:51 AM PDT by
zeugma
(The Brownshirts have taken over American Universities.)
To: BenLurkin
I tried denying the obamas for 8 years.
20 posted on
05/19/2017 11:31:06 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: BenLurkin
In high school, if the math does not work until you add in something make believe, your answer is probably wrong.
Apparently if you apply that logic to the real universe you get called names.
21 posted on
05/19/2017 11:37:19 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
his theory that fixes Newtonian physics instead of postulating the existence of dark matter and dark energy seems like changing the math would be preferable to multiplying the existence of non-observable entities beyond necessity
28 posted on
05/19/2017 12:01:39 PM PDT by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: BenLurkin
Bookmark for later. I would not be surprised if it ultimately turns out that dark matter was a mistake.
40 posted on
05/19/2017 4:07:40 PM PDT by
mlo
To: BenLurkin
Science,
We don’t need no freaking Science to prove our reality today.
“Dark matter/energy”, is exactly that. Dark, unknown and undiscoverable.
The secularist like it this way.
45 posted on
05/19/2017 4:56:39 PM PDT by
Zeneta
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson