Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One America News Network pulls lucrative job offer to Bill O'Reilly
Washington Examiner ^ | June 20, 2017 | Mandy Mayfield

Posted on 06/20/2017 8:29:06 PM PDT by huldah1776

Robert Herring, CEO of the One America News Network, announced Tuesday that his network was pulling a lucrative job offer made to former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly.

"We are pulling offer to @billoreilly, it could have paid him more than he made at Fox. We wish him luck. #OANN" the OANN CEO tweeted.

[tweet image/link here at source]

Herring confirmed the offer to Mediaite and told them he "wanted to move on" after O'Reilly and his agent failed to contact the network following discussions O'Reilly and OANN regarding his joining the network, according to a report.

Herring said the offer would "have been very good," possibly more than the roughly $25 million he was reportedly contracted for with Fox News.


TOPICS: Humor; Local News; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: news; oann; oreilly; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
PULLED the offer. Would have been GREAT if I watched it. Don't have a tv. I have internet. Maybe I'll watch him when he streams. Doubt it. I can read faster than most people talk. $25 million @ fox? Can't imagine.
1 posted on 06/20/2017 8:29:07 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Where does One America get its money? Do they run commercials? I haven’t seen any ads on their site.


2 posted on 06/20/2017 8:31:02 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

you’re lucky you don’t have a tv. It’s a good way to get the AIDS


3 posted on 06/20/2017 8:32:20 PM PDT by brucedickinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Thank you, Lord.


4 posted on 06/20/2017 8:32:25 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Who’d he give the falafel treatment to over there?


5 posted on 06/20/2017 8:33:18 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

O’Reilly’s bloviating ego got in the way. Billy-Oh thinks he is going to start his own network. He will end up like Glenn Beck, playing to the crickets. OAN would have been a good fit for both, boosting both their fortunes.


6 posted on 06/20/2017 8:44:07 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Excellent move by OANN ..... I think you guys / gals ... have an All-Star Team right now.

I watch OANN and love it! They live up to their mission; - excellent reporting of the facts without all peanut brain opinions of people that don’t matter anyway!

Hiring O’Reilly would have been a disaster!


7 posted on 06/20/2017 8:48:38 PM PDT by EnglishOnly (Fight all out to win OR get out now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brucedickinson

Boy are you confused


8 posted on 06/20/2017 8:50:53 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776
I like OANN 'as is'.
I don't get cable (I watch OANN through KlowdTV on the internet/AppleTV), so I really haven't seen much of Bill O'Reilly, but the little I've seen has not been impressive. The OANN people are good - and they do a good job reporting the news without the Leftwing slant we get from the other networks. I believe they are better off without the Bill O'Reilly addition - albeit, short term, he probably would have brought them additional viewers.
9 posted on 06/20/2017 8:52:50 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Don’t think O’Reilly is motivated by money. Wants control and independence.


10 posted on 06/20/2017 8:53:54 PM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnglishOnly
Re: 7

Agreed. I was busy typing my post (9) while you posted your response.

11 posted on 06/20/2017 8:53:57 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

So soon? They couldn’t have been negotiating for very long.
I guess somebody with influence at OAN was feeling disrespected.


12 posted on 06/20/2017 8:55:48 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

They run a fair amount of commercials. Established companies. I really like them. I leave it on my televisions all the time just to tell the mainstream media what I think of their crap.


13 posted on 06/20/2017 8:58:55 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

“it could have paid him more than he made at Fox.”

Horsecrap.


14 posted on 06/20/2017 9:10:47 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnglishOnly

Good points. Agree. OAN. Better off.


15 posted on 06/20/2017 9:31:29 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Yes, they run ads. They are picking up new sponsors all the time. For a while they didn’t have any though.

If this news is true it’s more proof that O’Reily has rocks in his head.


16 posted on 06/20/2017 9:35:43 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

The Daily Ledger is everything O’Reilly’s show should have been.


17 posted on 06/20/2017 9:41:37 PM PDT by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JMS

O’Reily wouldn’t have been a good fit at OAN. He’s too full of himself and thinks everything’s all about him. Like the entire world is waiting to hear what HE has to say about things. Ha, who made him media Pope? OAN probably didn’t agree to let him constantly hock his books either.


18 posted on 06/20/2017 10:06:03 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: El Cid
I also like how they show (between segments) the quotes from past Presidents, educational blurbs about the Constitution, etc. Kind of like a PSA/Did you know type of thing. It's a really nice touch instead of just straight commercials.

For the time being, OAN is a bunch of unknown personalities (which is OK), but adding some star power would help expand its market share, and also diminish the standing of the Lamestream outlets more rapidly.

The more aggressive OAN is at enhancing its profile, the faster it will grow, because it has a very decent conservative (or at least non-liberal) thing going so far.

I'd be happy to settle for something even remotely resembling a balanced news outlet. It wouldn't have to be overtly conservative—just overtly pro-America and staunchly patriotic.

George Washington was doubtless right when he observed that political parties:

are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
Washington went on to argue:
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.
That's some pretty shrewd insight for a Founder who wasn't even considered an intellectual giant.

If we're honest about it, we should acknowledge that this can be true of either major party—Republicans or Democrats. I really do think that an era of post-partisan politics could be upon us, due to the Trump phenomenon. In any event, I certainly hope such attitudes begin to be more commonplace.

19 posted on 06/20/2017 10:06:05 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
"They run a fair amount of commercials. Established companies."

That's odd- they didn't run commercials when they first started, and for a good while afterwards. I can't remember seeing any, but I haven't watched them very much lately.

20 posted on 06/20/2017 10:06:10 PM PDT by matthew fuller ("we lose 93 million Americans a day to gun violence.” Governor Terry McAuliffe (D-VA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson