Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: x

“It would be nice if cadets at West Point learned that anybody who’d take the oath and then lead armies against what was their country was dangerously irresponsible, though.”

Those that say “Lincoln and the North fought to free the slaves” need to read and comprehend what you have written.


137 posted on 06/28/2017 5:29:25 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
Lincoln was trying to counter an unconstitutional secession.

Lee and others took an oath of loyalty to country and constitution and then led armies against what had been the US.

If Southern officers in the army and navy had made it clear from the beginning that they weren't going to take up arms against the United States, the country they'd sworn an oath of allegiance to, it would have taken the wind out of the movement for unilateral secession and the country's problems could have been resolved peacefully and amicably.

But they were too hungry for military glory. Or perhaps they were so used to not thinking about politics that at the one time when they needed to make a clear statement they couldn't do it.

As it was, plenty of Southerners in the navy and marines stayed in, notably David Farragut and Lee's cousin Samuel Phillips Lee. So did generals Winfield Scott and George Thomas.

142 posted on 06/28/2017 5:46:34 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: jeffersondem
Those that say “Lincoln and the North fought to free the slaves” need to read and comprehend what you have written.

You're the only one I know who says that.

149 posted on 06/28/2017 6:34:10 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson