Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Must Take Decisive Action on North Korea
Kinvig on Politics ^ | 8/9/2017 | Cameron Kinvig

Posted on 08/09/2017 3:44:21 PM PDT by ckinv368

The world has watched, seemingly without recourse, as North Korea continues to rapidly develop intercontinental nuclear missile capabilities. After two recent tests, experts now believe North Korea could strike as far as Chicago or London. Those favoring diplomacy above all else—which has utterly failed over the past 25 years—must realize that North Korea is on the cusp of being able to threaten every US citizen on a whim.

Now, according to a report released by the Defense Intelligence Agency, North Korea has successfully produced a miniaturized nuclear warhead that will fit its ballistic missiles. While North Korea may not yet have mastered the engineering for re-entry, that science has been set for almost 70 years. Coupled with today’s high-tech polymers, it is likely North Korea will solve the re-entry puzzle in months, not years. With the US now estimating North Korea has up to 60 nuclear weapons in its arsenal, the North Korea threat is getting much bigger, much faster than anyone anticipated.

What should be done? Many will point to the aggressive new round of economic sanctions the UN Security Council passed this week. But North Korea has been under one form of sanction or another for decades, to little effect. Even if sanctions are complied with by China and Russia, the North Korean leadership thinks nothing of allowing hundreds of thousands of its people to die of starvation. If sanctions fail—as they likely will—few options remain for South Korea, Japan, and the United States other than military action in one form or another.

South Korea’s new president—Moon Jae-in—initially campaigned on easing tensions with the North. He halted deployment of the US-built THAAD missile defense system as a sign of good faith. He has now reversed course. And he is not alone. According to the South Korean Yonhap news agency, the leader of South Korea’s minority political party recently called for the deployment of US tactical nuclear weapons in the country. The New York Times reports that some surveys show a majority of South Koreans favor developing their own nuclear weapons as a defensive deterrent.

Japan also appears ready to take aggressive military action. Its prime minister is seeking to change Japan’s pacifist constitution to allow pre-emptive offensive military strikes. And, according to Hideshi Takesada, a leading defense specialist in Japan, “if South Korea went nuclear, that debate would happen in Japan, too.”

The possibility of a regional nuclear arms race—with three allied nuclear powers in the region (including the United States)—may be enough to spur China to take action to deter North Korea. But, if history is any indication, China will still try to play both sides, with only limited effect.

This leaves the United States with few good options. The US doesn’t necessarily want either Japan or South Korea to possess nuclear arsenals. Of course, allowing North Korea to develop the ability to strike US cities at will—with the nuclear blackmail that would inevitably follow—is simply not acceptable. While the world rests in the hope that North Korea will come to the negotiating table, the US must prepare for an eventuality where that doesn’t occur, and military force will be needed.

Due to advanced weaponry, there is little to stop the US from successfully destroying North Korea’s nuclear weapons program—located both above and below ground. And, the US has the ability to kill North Korea’s leader almost at will—prior to a recent ballistic missile launch, US intelligence watched live for 70 minutes as Kim Jong Un smoked cigarettes and strolled around the missile. That was more than enough time for the US to destroy the missile and kill Kim.

The reason military options are fraught with peril is the expected North Korean response. The North has thousands of hidden artillery pieces and missile launchers capable of reaching Seoul, and over 1,000 ballistic missiles capable of reaching as far as Tokyo. It also has over 70 submarines and dozens of surface ships capable of inflicting damage in a defensive strike.

In conjunction with South Korea and Japan, the US must prepare a significant, and carefully choreographed, military contingency where civilians are quickly evacuated, while the artillery and rockets threatening Seoul are pre-emptively neutralized (perhaps through significant stealth bombing), North Korea’s nuclear weapons capability is destroyed, and, possibly, its leadership decapitated. This effort will require more than cruise missiles and stern statements, and will bear the hallmarks of a major military operation, with hundreds of bombs and missiles, dozens of aircraft and ships, and the full military might of the United States. Civilians will undoubtedly die on both sides, but the North Korean threat will be neutralized. No doubt, this is a last-ditch option. But, where the safety of the entire American people is at stake, we must be decisive in our actions.

For additional commentary like this, please visit www.cameronkinvig.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; History; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: donaldtrump; nknukes; northkorea; nuclearweapons; trumpasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: ckinv368

Something to keep in mind, the Korean War never ended. We are still at war so the President does not need to get Congress approval.

My fear is we no longer have patriots at the top level of our Government or the Military. The plans for an attack will be leaked as soon as they are made.


21 posted on 08/09/2017 4:40:04 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster; ckinv368

The article is very well written and informative. It was posted in its entirety. I’ve looked at the blog, and it is replete with other articles of similar quality. Welcome to FR, ckinv368, which as you can see has its share of the underinformed over-opinionated.


22 posted on 08/09/2017 4:41:02 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368
If it comes to war -- seems likely -- then I would reword this a bit:

This effort will require more than cruise missiles and stern statements, and will bear the hallmarks of a major military operation, with hundreds of bombs and missiles, dozens of aircraft and ships, and the full military might of the United States.

to: "This effort will require more than cruise missiles and stern statements, and will bear the hallmarks of a major military operation, with many thousands of bombs and missiles, over a thousand aircraft, many ships... essentially all military might the United States can apply, plus all of the considerable capabilities of the South Koreans, and everything the Japanese can add, as well."

It would not take all that to knock out North Korea's nuclear capability, but it WILL take all that to rapidly quash a determined North Korean attack on Seoul.

23 posted on 08/09/2017 5:01:50 PM PDT by Paul R. (I don't want to be energy free, we want to be energy dominant in terms of the world. -D. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

Somethings got to give
You can only keep keep forces on hair trigger alert so long


24 posted on 08/09/2017 5:05:04 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Quit it DUMBASSES How did we deal with this in the 50s and 60s during the COLD WAR with Russia? he he They had way more sophisticated ICBMs than the NORKS? At one point we had bombers in the air 24/7 armed with Nuclear weapons that flew over the North Pole and back. Most here do not remember that.

Throughout the late 1950s and into the 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had been developing missile systems with the ability to shoot down incoming ICBM warheads. During this period, the US considered the defense of the US as part of reducing the overall damage inflicted in a full nuclear exchange. As part of this defense, Canada and the US established the North American Air Defense Command (now called North American Aerospace Defense Command).

By the early 1950s, US research on the Nike Zeus missile system had developed to the point where small improvements would allow it to be used as the basis of an operational ABM system. Work started on a short-range, high-speed counterpart known as Sprint to provide defense for the ABM sites themselves. By the mid-1960s, both systems showed enough promise to start development of base selection for a limited ABM system dubbed Sentinel. In 1967, the US announced that Sentinel itself would be scaled down to the smaller and less expensive Safeguard. Soviet doctrine called for development of its own ABM system and return to strategic parity with the US. This was achieved with the operational deployment of the A-35 ABM system and its successors, which remain operational to this day. http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/politics/pentagon-missile-test-north-korea-iran/index.html


25 posted on 08/09/2017 5:12:43 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (---->VMFA 235 '69 -'72 KMCAS <--- F4 PHANTOM... FLYING BRICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Too late I would say.


26 posted on 08/09/2017 5:13:19 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

If they can put one in a missile they can put one in a torpedo and covertly launch them in major ports.


27 posted on 08/09/2017 5:38:29 PM PDT by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Activate Star Wars.

Use Trident submarines.

Unload. Turn N Korea, china and the Muslim world into sheets of glass . No more problems.

It’s what I would do.


28 posted on 08/09/2017 6:07:43 PM PDT by Democrat_media (News Media,Mueller & democrat party doing a coup against Trump w/ Russia lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368; humblegunner

Welcome to FR.
Sic `em boy.


29 posted on 08/09/2017 6:24:04 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

This is probably not going to end well.


30 posted on 08/09/2017 6:29:37 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368

Shocking


31 posted on 08/09/2017 6:38:58 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ckinv368
Yeah, but it was the last thought in the article that got to me. The author speculates that maybe Kim will spare California because most people there didn't vote for Trump.

Maybe Kim is really stupid. After all, Hitler sent the German army into Russia without winter clothing. But, my guess is that Kim wants Lockheed Martin in San Jose.

32 posted on 08/09/2017 7:21:36 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson