My God, can you imagine the riots if he walked? They would never allow that even if the evidence is overwhelming that he was in fear for his life which I tend to believe is the case considering the violence the Antifa terrorists endorse.
My kind of case (IF HE WAS REALLY FLEEING AND IN JUSTIFIABLE FEAR OF IS LIFE! If he was really trying to kill/maim people, I would not take the case)
Yes, he is a Nazi ahole, BUT ASSUMING HE WAS REALLY FLEEING AND IN FEAR OF HIS LIFE, I’d find one person on the jury that agrees that in America, even Nazis deserve to be safe and secure in their homes, their cars, their persons.
I’d put his parents and adult Nazis, who, when he was a kid, let him believe this Nazi BS, and the violent AntiFa people “on trial,” and I’d find that one juror I need!
.... and knowing what we know now, I would put the person who ordered the cops to leave “on trial” too.... big time!
Remember what the State will do. First they will “Try the crime, then they will try the criminal.”
State will spend days telling how bad the crime is, how the people who were hit suffered, sow the autopsy X-rays with all the broken bones. Then when they have jury thoroughly disgusted, they will offer the def as the person responsible.
The trick in a case like this is, never try to “defend the crime.” Agree that the injures were bad, the suffering more so. But then, lay the responsibility on the reap persons who are to blame, if in fact it was not the driver.
Put the jury into his car, with the AntiFa beating on it, telling him they wanted to kill him, using their spray can flamethrowers, etc.
IF TRUE, this is a winnable case.