Posted on 08/27/2017 9:34:26 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
‘Did you answer my question about who except politicians could resolve this issue?’
You apparently have a goldfish-like memory. You haven’t come up with a new, interesting question for years. I answered the above question previously. Apparently it was one of those posts—evidently most if not all—that you didn’t bother to read.
This is not the first time I’ve mentioned this to you. You’re like a bot that has a sequence of preprogrammed proof texts and questions. You cycle through these deathly boring items with monotonous regularity. Like any bot, you never deviate. You have nothing fresh or insightful. Just rote replies, mixed with a smattering of questions, all of which you’ve posted hundreds if not thousands of times.
I can’t imagine functioning with such a mindset. The only questions I repeat are the ones the Obots can’t answer. It wouldn’t occur to me to post a question, receive a responsive, rational and factual reply, wait a while, AND THEN POST THAT EXACT SAME QUESTION AGAIN.
To do that means one of two things. The person is simply not very bright, and sincerely cannot recall posting the same question previously, or the person is a troll.
With you, it’s likely half and half. You’d be the best one to say for certain, but really, who cares?
Yeah, I didn’t think you were smart enough to understand it.
You post a link to an American Thinker article that only says Evan says he talked to Abercrombie. And I post a link that shows on the same day he says he talked to Abercrombie’s office. Which is the story he repeats several days later on several other news programs (FOX, Peter Boyle’s) and which he hasn’t changed yet.
I overestimated your intelligence, sorry about that.
Are you drinking?
Just did another search. Exactly as I said, Evans ***admitted*** that he said on one of the radio stations that he spoke directly to “Neil.” Evans apologized for that “one” statement.
However, the article includes transcripts from two other radio stations where Evans made the same statement. In both cases he said he had spoken to Neil, and was told by Abercrombie directly that after using all his powers as governor he was unable to locate a BC for Obama. Evans asked Abercrombie what that meant. Neil told him it could mean trouble in the next election.
You want the link: find it.
Update. Mike Evans said on at least *three* radio stations that Neil Abercrombie told him directly that no BC existed in HI for Obama. In one interview, Evans said that Abercrombie told him the lack of an Obama BC could make trouble in the next election.
Of course, that was before ‘Neil’ replaced Palafox with Fuddy. Problem solved.
It is not probable Obama was born in Hawaii.
No one with a legit social security number would use preowned ones from their first teenaged job until and including when they were president of the United States.
Newborn, he has only been seen in Seattle with a mom
Who didn’t know how to take care of him. Clearly his teen mom
Was sent across the border from her high school to an unwed mothers home in Vancouver. She was supposed to give her mixed baby up for adoption. She wasn’t old
Enough to confer citizenship upon her baby.
And his selective service form is as phony as his BC.
He was never an American until he was a US Senator and given a ceremonial passport.
That was a lot of words to say absolutely nothing.
I’ll ask again. Since you believe that politicians and bureaucrats will lie, who besides these lying politicians and bureaucrats could have resolved the Obama eligibility issue to your satisfaction? I already reminded you that as a private citizen and businessman, Donald Trump hired private investigators in 2011 and sent them to Hawaii. But over five years those investigators led Mr. Trump to conclude that “Obama was born in the United States, period.” He went on to say that “Hillary Clinton started the birther movement, I ENDED it.”
Its really not that difficult a question. Even someone of your obviously limited intelligence ought to be able to answer it.
This game of yours is retarded. You’ve asked me this same question before. I answered. If you didn’t read the answer, or if it went in one ear and out the other, that is not my problem.
Here is your problem. You approach everything as a leftist—sometimes as an outright moonbat. You dishonestly came to FR years ago for no other reason than to defend obama. You bold-faced lied your way out of being banned, so you are still here.
Here is the honest truth. Conservatives can get into the mindset of liberalism and understand it. Leftists cannot do the same for conservatism. Leftists have a caricature-view of conservatives, and cannot see past it.
So you, a far-Leftist troll, post on these threads demanding answers. When you get them you can’t comprehend them. They don’t penetrate past your Leftist presuppositions.
Nevertheless you, seemingly having no life and time to burn, keep demanding. It’s a joke. In a hundred years you’ll never understand the conservative POV.
And you’ll be the last to know.
Herein lies the problem:
“But Haidt’s research went one step further, asking self-indentified conservatives to answer those questionnaires as if they were liberals and for liberals to do the opposite. What Haidt found is that conservatives understand liberals’ moral values better than liberals understand where conservatives are coming from. Worse yet, liberals don’t know what they don’t know; they don’t understand how limited their knowledge of conservative values is. If anyone is close-minded here it’s not conservatives.’
More nothing.
That’s nice but it doesn’t address how to get around what you referenced as the potential lying of politicians and bureaucrats when it comes to investigating the birthplace of Barack Obama.
What’s your plan for dealing with any alleged lying politicians? How would you get around the corroborating evidence of the August 13 & 14, 1961 newspaper birth notices and the interview notes of an INS agent from 8/31/61 where he quotes Obama’s father as saying he had a new Hawaii-born son?
If you had a conservative bone in your body you could answer 99.9% of your questions yourself. That’s why I left liberalism: I started answering the questions.
Try, for once in your life, to think like a conservative. You’ll be amazed at how easy your questions are to answer. (Especially since I’ve previously answered them.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.