Skip to comments.
Democrat Alcee Hasitngs Used $220,000 From From Tax Payer sexual Harassment Slush Fund
Pacific Pundit ^
| 12/8/2017
| Pacific Pundit
Posted on 12/09/2017 9:27:15 AM PST by conservativejoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: conservativejoy
What is the count now 6-7 Dems to 0 Reps? I see a pattern.
To: conservativejoy
Award him the Horndog-Clinton Star of Valor.
3
posted on
12/09/2017 9:30:03 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
To: conservativejoy
I wonder if it was harrassment...or just givig his “honey” some money. Who’s to know the difference?
To: conservativejoy
As a previously impeached judge, this further behavior should have been enough for the House Ethics Committee to oust this charlatan from American public life once and for all.
5
posted on
12/09/2017 9:32:29 AM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
To: conservativejoy
Another Black Caucus sexual predator is exposed!
6
posted on
12/09/2017 9:34:11 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Build Kate's wall! Keep illegals and illegal murderers/criminals out of America! MAGA! SLAP ACT!!)
To: conservativejoy
...the tax payer funded slush fund...
Say what?
7
posted on
12/09/2017 9:34:24 AM PST
by
McGruff
(Lock Her Up! In a Padded Cell!)
To: conservativejoy
I thought maybe he used most of it but I knew he used some. The more Left, the more corrupt!
8
posted on
12/09/2017 9:34:40 AM PST
by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: conservativejoy
Wasn’t Hastings impeached, convicted and removed for fraud or bribery or something?
9
posted on
12/09/2017 9:35:15 AM PST
by
FroggyTheGremlim
(Democrats: the political party of the undead)
To: mad_as_he$$
He should be arrested for tax evasion. He received a $220,000 benefit by having a 3rd party pay is debts. The $220,000 is income to him.
To: conservativejoy
I know this will sound Racist and probably will be blocked, but nobody else will say it, so I will. When the total names of those who used the slush fund to pay off their Sexual Harassment claims are revealed, take a look at the number of Black Representatives who are members of the Black Congressional Caucus who are amongst those named. It may be revealing, although the media will never highlight it. Conyers and Hastings may be just the tip of the Iceberg.
To: mad_as_he$$
The POSs should be forced to pay it all back to the taxpayers.
12
posted on
12/09/2017 9:36:59 AM PST
by
lgjhn23
(It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
To: Mr. Jeeves
yes, impeached for bribery, then elected to the House, as someone else said, the Democrats are just too pure!
To: mad_as_he$$
Perhaps the fund is misnamed.
Free mistress payments perhaps is a better category for the deadbeats.
14
posted on
12/09/2017 9:39:24 AM PST
by
Pikachu_Dad
("the media are selling you a line of soap")
To: Gahanna Bob
To: conservativejoy
This goes further than those who are so lacking in integrity that they use government money as a hush fund. They're compromised beyond being able to govern effectively, for sure. They should go. But who in the US Senate or HOR knew about the fund? Anyone who knew about it and was okay with it should go, too. If it means all of them would have to go, it sure would go a long way toward draining the swamp.
Instead, they're enabling "guilty until proven innocent" witch hunts. And a lot of it is against people who might or might not have human flaws. I'm all for letting the voters decide if the pol who has been targetted never used government money to pay anyone off and hasn't been convicted of anything criminal.
16
posted on
12/09/2017 9:41:15 AM PST
by
grania
(Deplorable and Proud of It!)
To: conservativejoy
Democrats always on stage with their magic act one hand pointing to someone and the other hand in the till.
17
posted on
12/09/2017 9:42:19 AM PST
by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacted the most.)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Being a Democrat probably shielded him from being banned from future federal office after he was convicted in the Senate. This should drive him out of office for good.
-PJ
18
posted on
12/09/2017 9:43:15 AM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: conservativejoy
Nothing is being done to him because he has “black privilege”.
19
posted on
12/09/2017 9:44:19 AM PST
by
deweyfrank
(Nobody's Perfect)
To: conservativejoy
Another poster-person for Term Limits
20
posted on
12/09/2017 9:47:54 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson