[butterdezillion]

See my post at https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3620805/posts?page=28#28 and the follow-up posts I posted.

The birth announcements are a whole ‘nother story. Signs of forgery all over the place.

And actually, the very fact that wikileaks was the source of the first image of the Advertiser announcement, when Wikileaks claims to expose non-published work, should tell people something.

I had a librarian tell me that there is no way we can authenticate the microfilm copy in her library. And that would only be the case if somebody monkeyed with that specific microfilm copy.

[wintertime]

Re: “And actually, the very fact that wikileaks was the source of the first image of the Advertiser announcement, when Wikileaks claims to expose non-published work, should tell people something.”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What does it tell, please? I haven't followed this aspect of Obama’s eligibility.