Posted on 01/09/2018 2:55:02 PM PST by MNDude
Some of us have been following the postings of Q on 8chan. I started out skeptical about this an ominous figure who claimed to speak for the White House and its secret war against the swamp. This week he really dismissed many doubts I had about his legitimacy. If you did not see this, it will blow you away.
Q made this statement as proof: good[win] [win] when [15]
EXACTLY 15 minutes late Trump added the word "Goodwin" to one of his recent Tweets.
Next, president Trump misspelled the word consequential with the word consensual on his Twitter. (letter q missing)
Q points out the next marker with [1]
Exactly one minute later president Trump updates his tweet and puts the Q into the misspelled word.
Q immediately posts "marker [1] confirmed "
There have some other pretty big proof given in the past of the legitimacy of Q. For example, you stated we are crossing the Delaware, and the next day one of Trump's generals posted a picture on Twitter of Washington Crossing the Delaware.
If Q is legit, and it is hard to see otherwise considering the New Evidence, then it is really exciting based on everything that he has posted!
My problem with the Q thing is all the hubris and egoism. These are desperate times, crippling the deep state, and the tone of those posts is too attention-seeking and self-congratulatory. I don’t feel Q’s a friendly.
Yes and Amen.
I buried Paul...
I have no idea.
I don’t like the ‘Q’ thing, because I think that the average person can understand and take Straight Talk more productively than they can take all of Q’s gobbledegook.
I just think that there are much better ways of doing what the Q seems to be trying to do (IF we take Q as a ‘benign’ influence - and I’m not at all convinced that Q is benign.)
QAnon started posting more recently, and at first, MegaAnon welcomed QAnon to the fight. However, some of QAnon's predictions ended up being duds, and as a result, MegaAnon warned that QAnon may have been compromised, or, worst yet, deep-state distractors.
I'm siding with MegaAnon for now.
...”I have it on good authority that Q is actually quix”....
LOOL....
I’ve posted elsewhere that I will take information from the daily comments and actions of our POTUS.
I agree...it is just that.
Could have been a drone pic.
Am I really the only person that recognizes- Classy Green Eyed Blonde? I wonder how her host is?
Q’s style and tone reminds me if Sorcha Faal’s.
I saw this too, great post, it’s unbelievably amazing.
The claim was that it was a photo taken FROM Air Force One with POTUS Trump on board. The claim was presented in a list of points meant to establish the high credibility of Q as an anonymous person close to Trump and involved in some highly sensitive capacity with US intel or military programs.
Posting a drone pic would be irrelevant to the claim that has been made above on behalf of “Q” credibility....
AF1 would never go near North Korean airspace. The fact that Q seems not to know that implies that Q is NOT in any way associated with US intel or defense agencies, and in fact is much more likely to be an internet warrior LARPing.
I don’t know if the guy is legit or not, but that statement is a huge red flag if it really originated in any way from Q.
Even then some will not want to know; they will be forced to know.
Much as a wife of a cheating husband that may know in her heart he is cheating; yet does not want to rock the boat so acts as though she hasn’t a clue. When a well meaning friend tells her the truth, then she must deal with it.
You’re doing great.
Now all you have to do is have something like 50% of the content and 75% of the meaning to appear in Trump’s tweets.
this page shows about that and doesn’t seem to have anything to do with North Korea that I can see. let me know if I’m mistaken.
That’s been kind of interesting to me too; it’s been especially gratifying to find that a lot of the young digital ‘Cognoscenti’ are conservatively-inclined and profoundly Patriotic.
Thanks, so the problem may be with whoever wrote the “Q FAQ” posted in #31.
Because at your link the claim most certainly has nothing to do with Air Force One flying over North Korea. The claimed flight path is between Da Nang, Vietnam and Beijing, China... with the photo allegedly taken over the South China Sea. That is a radically different thing than what aroused my attention in #31. The discussion of the photos at your link seems quite plausible to me, on a first overview (and not claiming expertise).
So now I have no reason to doubt Q, from that claim about the photo, because (apparently) a very inaccurate statement was wrongly attributed to Q. But whoever created those “FAQ” items has grossly misstated the claim about the photograph (which has nothing to do with AF1 being over North Korea). That is a problem in a lot of this stuff, people post their own summaries and glosses which may or may not be accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.