Replies

YEP
THAT MEANS LOTS MORE PEOPLE SAW HOW CORRUPT REFS CAN CHANGE A GAME OUTCOME...

GIVE THE REF’S 100 YARDS FOR NE.....

tough to win when the refs on the other side...

THE NFL IS LOOKING TO GET THE FOCUS ON BRADY AND AWAY FROMT THE KNEELERS ....
just give NE the trophy and save the hangovers ....

How many marquee pitchers get 4 inches off the plate? Or, how many stars of all sports get the edge from the refs? Sure, the pass interference call was a stretch, but not equal to the Dallas flag pickup of yesteryear, remember that?

Frankly, the Jags beat themselves in the second half on offense and Brady beat the top rated Jag defense... or more accurately, he shredded it.

But, it's how he did it that earned the Patriot victory - notwithstanding the ref calls which are generally bad. Gronk is knocked out (and yes the pass interference looked like a makeup for that).

Brady beat the Jags with Danny Amendola, a 5' 11" inch receiver that runs a 4.6 - fact is, Brady finds reception room in an angstrom of space on the field and the receiver matters not.

Brady, a Trump fan, beat the Jags. Enough for me and should be for thee.

LOL

Every year there are “the refs were paid off” conspiracy theorists.

If the game hinges on a key call then the losing team deserved to lose anyway.

I don’t see anyone claiming the refs changed the outcome of the Philly game despite the fact the nfl NEEDED a NE/Philly SB to avoid a catastrhic drop in ratings.

I may not be following this year but this line of thinking always cracks me up.