[grey_whiskers]

You have to be careful. It is included on the qcodefag.github page, but there are posts there which are from Anons, to which Q responded. The issue is that of the 3 posts @Fantasywriter made such a fuss over, only one was signed Q Clearance Patriot, and the others were not. All of them were from before any tripcode had been established.

And of course the difference between "arrest" == "frogmarched" vs. "discreetly fingerprinted and photographed and issued and ankle bracelet" and the fact that an indictment may be sealed, and need not result in incarceration, is lost on the troll.

[bagster]

Ya. But I think you lay out a good case that Q did NOT specifally state She and Huma would be arrested on a certain date and time. It was the other guy, right? Lacking that, Q saying she WOULD be arrested is a legit prediction. I hate to be pinned down by a specific date and time because that is a valid point for the deniers and hard to argue against. I'm an arguer but a poor researcher.

So, do I have the right of this?

[Fantasywriter]

If anyone is concerned that they may be confusing Q’s posts with the replies and comments of other chan users, there is a quick and simple solution. PM me, and I will explain the extremely easy process of identifying and differentiating authentic Q posts.

Btw, the posts re the public arrests, dates, etc, re Hillary, Podesta and Huma, etc., are all authentic Q.