My position: At the risk of sounding wishy-washy, I’m leaning agnostic.
Q has been right about a lot. I believe he definitely has some insight and is not just guessing. But the cryptic nature of the messages is a bit off-putting and puzzling. Is the cryptic nature because he’s hedging his bets in case he’s wrong? Or could it be a timing issue? Is he vague because things take time and he can’t really predict how long things will take? No one can foresee every event and every unexpected hurdle, so that might account for a lot of the vagueness, too. He’s giving himself some wiggle room for those unexpected plot twists. Even if he’s a Trump insider, he can’t predict what wacky new thing the democrats/libs/media are going to throw out there.
Possibilities:
1. Q is an excellent student of human nature and is paying attention to the actual facts and extrapolating sensibly.
2. Q is an insider in the Trump administration acting to help the President, but without his knowledge. Trying to pave the way for the public to accept and understand what is going to be revealed in the memos, emails, texts, etc.
3. Same as 2, but with Trump’s knowledge and support.
4. Just a crackpot.
I don’t think it’s 4. #3 would surprise me the least.
I think we’re going to learn a LOT in the State of the Union. I’m stocking up on popcorn!
The vagueness could well be a security shield.