Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LukeL
“And 100% of liberals do not understand that the 3/5th compromise actually limited the power of the slave owning south.”

True.

The South wanted to count slaves as full persons but the North insisted on counting slaves as zero. The respective arguments were to both sides’ economic and political best self interest. It is possible that if the South's nascent attempt to view slaves as full human beings had been encouraged the North's perceived need to later attack and destroy their regional rivals could have been avoided.

But the North insisted so the South - as they would do many times to preserve the Union created by Washington, Lee, Jefferson, Madison, Mason - agreed to the 3/5 compromise which harmed their (South's) best self interests.

16 posted on 02/13/2018 6:50:46 AM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
It is possible that if the South's nascent attempt to view slaves as full human beings had been encouraged the North's perceived need to later attack and destroy their regional rivals could have been avoided.

LOL! There was no "nascent attempt" to view slaves as humans. Just a crass political ploy to obtain more power in government than their population called for. As it was, they settled for half a loaf. Or rather 3/5ths of one. Not the first compromise the North made to try and satisfy the South, but one of the few the South would accept.

18 posted on 02/13/2018 7:00:39 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson