And 100% of liberals do not understand that the 3/5th compromise actually limited the power of the slave owning south.
True.
The South wanted to count slaves as full persons but the North insisted on counting slaves as zero. The respective arguments were to both sides’ economic and political best self interest. It is possible that if the South's nascent attempt to view slaves as full human beings had been encouraged the North's perceived need to later attack and destroy their regional rivals could have been avoided.
But the North insisted so the South - as they would do many times to preserve the Union created by Washington, Lee, Jefferson, Madison, Mason - agreed to the 3/5 compromise which harmed their (South's) best self interests.
Yep. Otherwise it would have been the Republic of Virginia and Company
BINGO - Bull’s eye - Right on the money. Thank you.
Libs will do anything, slant any view, change any definition, to become victims who demand you give them something - respect, advantage, etc.
We all need to figure out the real “why” behind things and not accept the liberal “why’s”.