Absolutely no way she can talk this back.
And illegal.
Crazy how she talks about how ‘our democracy works’ after rigging a Democrat Party presidential nomination and then jumping head deep in a BS dossier, etc. against her opponent in a national presidential election. Like WTF is she smoking now!?
and that came when she was absolutely sure she was going to be crowned.
Knowing that, read her statement again and you see that she knows she will be POTUS.
I’m 72, and it’s the first election I’ve ever heard of anyone even THINKING about questioning (after all the recounts, of course).
Beside, WE DON’T LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY...that’s why you lost Hillary...it’s a REPUBLIC. If you don’t know how that works, you shouldn’t be in public, government service anyway.
Reading is our friend...try it Hillary. (How did she EVER get a law license without knowing all this type of stuff). The Pledge of Allegiance even says it’s a “republic”.
Someone ghostwrites talking points for her on what she allegedly said on this matter and she is so detached and arrogant that she thinks that people will actually believe the BS that she said them.
Bitch was horrified that he wouldn’t say he’d accept the results of all her attempted rigging of the election.
Indicative of the psychological state of Hillary and the Delusional The Lying Left is evidence of pathological defensiveness, denial, and delusional projection, delusional paranoia, and fantasy.
"The [Ego Disequilibrium] theory accepts the hypothesis that there is a hierarchy of defense functions with denial, delusional projection (including delusional paranoia), and distortion, the most primitive and hierarchically lowest defenses, followed by projection and fantasy..."
Anjan Chatterjee & H. Branch Coslett, The Neuropathologies of the Self (Chapt 11) in The Roots of Cognitive Neuroscience: Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology, 243 (2014).
https://www.amazon.com/Roots-Cognitive-Neuroscience-Behavioral-Neuropsychology/dp/0195395549/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1501699935&sr=1-1
The psychological state of Hillary and the Delusional The Lying Left:
My question is how in the world did we allow such a nitwit so close to the Presidency? After Obama, I thought America must be losing its mind. Der Hildebeast raised a big Red Flag about America’s sanity.
This, when she thought she was a shoo in.
This from the person who wanted to get rid of the 1st and 2nd Amendments plus the Electoral College.
16 months later the United States media has still refused to accept the election result... That’s not really horrifying... It’s laughable.
I expect that when Trump wins his second term they will begin to start warming up to the idea... Some of them of late, have even begun referring to the President, as the ‘President’ instead their usual refrain of simply referring to him as Trump. Of course... They are usually gritting their teeth while doing so.
She and the Democrats still refuse to accept Trump as President.
Yeah, but that was before she lost an election that had been rigged for her.
She still thinks she was cheated out of the election she had rigged.............
The media responded in their usual laid-back style:
A 'HORRIFYING' REPUDIATION OF DEMOCRACY -- The Washington Post, Oct. 20, 2016
DENIAL OF DEMOCRACY -- Daily News (New York), Oct. 20, 2016
DANGER TO DEMOCRACY -- The Dallas Morning News, Oct. 20, 2016
ONE SCARY MOMENT; IT ALL BOILED DOWN TO ... DEMOCRACY -- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Oct. 21, 2016
"(Shock) spiked down the nation's spinal column last night and today when the Republican nominee threatened that this little election thing you got there, this little democratic process you've got here, it's nice, it's fine, but he doesn't necessarily plan on abiding by its decision when it comes to the presidency." -- Rachel Maddow, Oct. 20, 2016
"Trump's answer on accepting the outcome of the vote is the most disgraceful statement by a presidential candidate in 160 years." -- Bret Stephens, then-deputy editorial page editor at The Wall Street Journal
"I guess we're all going to have to wait until Nov. 9 to find out if we still have a country -- if Donald Trump is in the mood for a peaceful transfer of power. Or if he's going to wipe his fat a-- with the Constitution." -- CBS's Stephen Colbert, Oct. 19, 2016
"It's unprecedented for a nominee of a major party to themselves signal that they would not accept -- you know, respect the results of an election. We've never had that happen before. ... This really presents a potentially difficult problem for governing ..." -- MSNBC'S Joy Reid, Oct. 22, 2016
"This is very dangerous stuff ... would seriously impair our functioning as a democracy. ... This is about as serious as it gets in the United States." -- CNN's Peter Beinart, Oct. 20, 2016
"Obviously, it's despicable for him to pretend that there's any chance that he would not accept the results of this election; it would be -- in 240 years you've never had anybody do it. ..." -- CNN's Van Jones, Oct. 20, 2016
Thats horrifying. Lets be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating he is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position. Hillary Clinton
Every losing presidential candidate in modern times has accepted the will of the voters, even in extraordinarily close races, such as when John F. Kennedy narrowly defeated Richard M. Nixon in 1960 and George W. Bush beat Al Gore in Florida to win the presidency in 2000, New York Times
Well, you see, it really didnt matter to her because she knew the fix was in and she was the guaranteed winner.
When that didnt occur, then there had to be something wrong with the election, because it had been previously fixed!
Bwahahahahahahaha
Democrats: The party of fake outrage in service to their agenda.