You don’t seem to be able to remain focused on the subject of this conversation.
The subject is the police shooting of an unarmed man and the lengths people will go to in order to justify it. That's not hard to see. What I'm trying to determine is where the line between justified and unjustified lies. As near as I can tell from your responses it's: 1) Stephon Clark - justified, 2) Justine Diamond, justified. Can't tell what you think about shooting unarmed guys with their pants down.
And lest you have any confusion where I stand I believe that shooting an unarmed suspect who is not posing any immediate threat to the safety of the officers or any innocent bystanders is not a justified use of deadly force, and the officers in question should be charged. Because under the laws in place at those locals, you or I certainly would be.