Posted on 05/11/2018 5:55:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
Re: the change in tone of recent Q drops
My least favorite is the latest one # 1341 re AJ.
Possibilities:
1. The Q trip code has been compromised. This is no longer Q posting.
2. Q believes that AJ/Corsi are or have become a liability that needs to be addressed.
3. A new member has been added to the Q team who chooses to address, rather than ignore AJ/Corsi.
4. Something big is going down RIGHT NOW and the Q team has left posting to a junior member while they are attending to bigger issues.
I’m kind of partial to #4, since I predicted this weekend would be big. So far, nothing as big as I was expecting has happened. Patience!
“A Song for You”
“Tight Rope”
and others. Good stuff.
FR mail
BOOM!
Q has gently encouraged AJ/Corsi to step back and reconsider. They have apparently decided not to heed that advice. They have self-marginalized.
I agree. I go to experts for their area of expertise, not their belief structure. Caveat: As long as that structure doesn’t affect their view of facts in a way that would contradict my observation of the same facts.
Tried that, didn’t work well, collected too many cookie crumbs.
Tired ? Anything is possible. We just shouldn’t rule any idea out because it’s not our own.
I didn’t say anything because I didn’t want to allude that Rogers was Q. And no one was mentioning that there was a difference in style and demeanor
Now it’s out of the bag so let’s move on
also LS tweeted this story:
SEKULOW: Deep State Admitted to Having 16 MORE PAGES of Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting Docs That it Will be Forced to Turn Over by Month End
Back off, Boris.
If you can locate that link, could you please ping me with it? Thanks.
You really need to step back from your computer.
____________________________________
I believe I am pushing back on assertions made by Corsi himself who is asserting that his validity outweighs that of Q.
I don’t believe I am engaging in name calling or placing myself above others on the thread.
Rereading my post now, I would like to clarify and apologize for my comment about those who spread disinformation, “can be abandoned because it will just work itself out” because while I do think that can be or sometimes is part of disinformation campaign, I don’t believe enlightened1 is “attacking” or part of a disinformation campaign. I know that it is possible for a person to believe that Q is a larp, Q is not real etc. and simply hold that honest opinion without collaborating with those who are not patriots etc. I wish I had made that clear when I posted.
Enlightened1 has contributed to my knowledge of Q and of world events in the past and has shown no hint of lack of patriotism. When I wrote about disinformation campaigns, I truly meant those who don’t honestly believe but utilize for the purpose of harm. When writing, that naturally excludes enlightened1 in my thinking, and all those with the honest opinion. My purpose in writing was to express an opinion counter to enlightened1 re is or isn’t Q moot at this point. I apologize to enlightened1 for writing without sufficient care - enlightned1 deserves more than that.
I keep reminding myself that what is BIG depends on point of view. I know I would love to see perp walks. But in the larger scheme of things, those are NOTHING to the fact that NK has announced it will destroy its nuclear installations BEFORE the peace talks. THAT, to me, is the big news this weekend and it’s sort of mindblowing.
Follicle? No.
Popsicle? No.
Doll ankle? No.
I dunno. I'm stumped.
Bagster
The Lesser Oracle
I want to hunt clowns, deep state, cage and prosecute them, not obsess for weeks over whoever this Corsi guy is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.