[hoosiermama]

Around the same time Q switched to new channel and the Q style went from socratarian to lecturing. (Stating facts and calling people out).

I said nothing thinking others would also see the change Wasn’t on thread much but catching up reading threads and posts in its entirety in the very early morning

Not saying that black hats took over just that there was a change in the style and premise of the Q posts.

[StormFlag]

I noticed the change, but wondered if it was due to the change in followers as well. If more people are just beginning to follow, they wouldn’t have time to decode messages, since it seems that things are moving a bit quickly now?

Just a thought.

[little jeremiah]

I noticed the change and figured the war was at a different stage now. I think others mentioned the same thing. New phase. End game.

[Axenolith]

Doesn’t the change in style and premise of posts coincide near exactly to the transition from building/preparation to “going active” with info and busts???

[grey_whiskers]

The change in style reflects the change in operational phase, see the Q drop a few days ago about Justice, and the one a day or two ago (the D5 one) about it cannot now be stopped.

[Jane Long]

Mail.

[Lopeover]

New leader, new phase - justice, new trip code. Double meaning - PATRIOTS shouldn’t FIGHT with each other.

[Lopeover]

I agree. Don’t need a decoder to understand it for the most part.

[defconw]

I noticed, but it seemed at least in my mind to correspond with the new phase of the plan. So? Just throwing that out there. I know I have not done a 10th of the work some have. Q could just be tired. I know my brain has had to take a break sometimes.

[STARLIT]

Not saying that black hats took over just that there was a change in the style and premise of the Q posts.

I saw the change but I had thought at the time Q had others take over because his part of the Plan was completed. Others took over for the next phase. I look for another change to come when people are actually being indicted.

[AZLiberty]

Mrs. AZLiberty just noticed something in a Grantchester book she's reading:

Q source

[From Wikipedia] The Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written independently, each using Mark and a second hypothetical document called "Q" as a source. Q was conceived as the most likely explanation behind the common material (mostly sayings) found in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke but not in Mark.

The Q source (also Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's Oral Tradition.

Coincidence?