Q Anon: (5/17/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/17/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[hoosiermama]

Learn something everyday

[generally]

Same here.

Every time they send a postage paid envelope with a survey and ask for a donation to go with it, they get an earful from me.

I’m probably wasting my time. I’m sure they don’t read it. But if enough of us do this, they will get the message that they are not fulfilling their campaign promises and are losing our support.

When they ask who I’d vote for, I tell them I will vote for a conservative. And if there is no conservative on the ballot, I might vote for the Republican, but never for another Bush.

[gymbeau]

I agree. Though it should be “Free Ransomnote - limited two per customer.”

[Disestablishmentarian]

I understand time division and space division switching/multiplexing very well ... but have no clue how you are relating this old (pre-packet switching) technology to Q.

[STARLIT]

Subject: Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding the Proposed Title X Family Planning Program Rule from the Department of Health and Human Services

poolreports Today 6:23pm

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 18, 2018

** *Statement from the Press Secretary Regarding the Proposed Title X Family Planning Program Rule from the Department of Health and Human Services*

The Administrations announcement today of a proposed rule on Title X family planning program fulfills President Donald J. Trumps promise to continue to improve womens health and ensure that Federal funds are not used to fund the abortion industry in violation of the law.

The President is pleased to support the proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which would update the regulations governing the Title X family planning program. This important proposal would ensure compliance with the programs existing statutory prohibition on funding programs in which abortion is a method of family planning.The new proposed rule would not cut funds from the Title X program. Instead, it would ensure that taxpayers do not indirectly fund abortions. Contrary to recent media reports, HHSs proposal does not include the so-called gag rule on counseling about abortion that was part of the Reagan Administrations Title X rule.

*###*

[hoosiermama]

Bizarre in deed
Make a person wonder what been going on and if it used government funding?

[pax_et_bonum]

:-)

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Suggestion: let’s all go to bed and let Swordy catch up. He is over 700 posts behind.

Nite, y’all.

[STARLIT]

Great idea..good night.

[generally]

It was too low to be measurable.

[bitt]

WHOA!!!! Love me some Grassley!

[Getsmart64]

*chuckle* Saved pic....if that’s ok with you?

[generally]

I’m not superstitious either. It’s bad luck to be superstitious. ;-)

[hoosiermama]

Good idea
(Have you told Q too Bought the time we drop. He drops! )

Good night Cletus

[smileyface]

nite

[bitt]

oh puleeze. you’re making us crazy.

[pax_et_bonum]

Lol! I didn’t know that!

We always called them hoot owls and I remember listening to them hooting deep in the woods at night when I was a little girl at our camp house.

[beef]

OK, I found it. Q moves around a lot! Thanks!

[MomwithHope]

Bookmark

[Dawggie]

“Just because somebody’s “retired” doesn’t mean he/she can’t get back into the game.” You are correct and I would consider it to get in on something like that.

The downturn in Aerospace during the late 80/90s created a hole in the labor force in the 40 to 55 year old range, senior talent base. Some of the larger companies are having problems meeting obligations with the young folk.

“That said, unless there’s been a major shakeup (JMHO), NASA couldn’t manage much but a bigger budget request for next year.” I think your sarcasm may be closer to reality than you intended.