How about this?
Science requires use of the scientific method, which entails controlled experiements with reproducible results.
Since controlled climate experiments are impossible, climate “science” does not use the scientific method and is therefore not science.
That works for me. Still doesn’t change that this article is full of non-scientific gibberish.
Exactly! Human beings are a fraction of a fraction in terms of our significance on the planet, we couldn’t change the climate if we all tried. Nonsense, non science Marxism in disguise.
Science is defined as a body of information obtained by methods based on observation. Physics, chemistry and other lab sciences enjoy the ability to repeat experiments in order to test whether results are reproducible.
Historical sciences don’t enjoy the repeatability. Examples are geology, evolution, etc. These sciences depend on observation but are not able to go back in time to repeat the experiment
Then, there are the really fuzzy sciences such as sociology and psychology. They are fuzzy because of the wide variation in the objects that are being observed.