Having it on with the DOJ
Except they’ll also expect a POLICE REPORT of the loss of the firearm, PRIOR to the claim being made. And by the way, if you make that report, you better be DAMN SURE that your gun is never discovered anywhere else.
All cute and Moulin Rouge and all the stuff about Civil War 2, but in the end, if the Left gets power, they WILL get our guns, and with very, very, little resistance...they simply are not so dumb as to take us on head-on (i.e., door to door), they’ll do it slowly, very slowly, until there’s too few of us left to stop them.
U.S. Navy Divers Tasked to Investigate Claims after the Supreme Court ruled that the legislation was constitutional.
So how can the DoD be called into perform an investigatory function in a law enforcement investigation?
As a diver who has worked with police in many recovery efforts, you “get a feel” when you are on a fools errand for a prosecutor. The old “I lost my guns overboard in a freak boating accident” is just such a dive op. OTOH, the US Navy is alway looking for realistic training ex’s that will keep their skills sharp.
I had a friend who once hosted a group from one of the Soviet satellite states in the early 90s, where guns were banned.
The guests told my friend they kept a shotgun buried in a hole and poured used motor into the hole to keep it from rusting.
Even though gun ownership was illegal, these guys were not unarmed.
As others write, too many people are weak sheep and will turn in guns rather than create risk for themselves. We see this already in Hawaii and other places where law abiding public is disarmed and only criminals and the government have guns. They are now dependent upon the goodwill of that government. Nobody fought back. California is much the same.
Did the see the “deep state” down there?
Later, when reporters asked the Navy to explain the 5,824 firearms stowed in the holds of the support vessels, a spokesman stated: “they were there when we left port, honest.”