Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/11/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This excellent photo was taken by Jesco Denzel, a German government photographer.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[little jeremiah]

#FLY[RR]FLY# = smashed fly [Rolls Royce engine problems will ground flights] to prevent [them] from fleeing - per WH instruction/agreement

---

Interesting. Whole thing but that is especially so.

[irish guard]

Pretty sure all the Q references to RR were about Rod Rosenstein and not Rolls Royce jet engines....especially when Q asked:

Where is [RR]?

What country specifically?

Why?

But hey, I'll let you worry about those jet engines.

[edzo4]

old news

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12068039

Surge in number of Rolls-Royce Dreamliner engines needing repairs expected
10 Jun, 2018 5:07pm

[TEXOKIE]

Good morning, ransomnote!

Just watched the opening to the Varney show on Fox Biz. I’m posting blind, but I thought what was presented with his first guest was of note, so I’ll risk chiming in late.

Following are my notes of the opening of the show.

Varney 6/12/18

Larry Kudlow has had mild heart attack and is in Walter Reid

Points of signed agreement, and info covered in press conference:
Sanctions stay until denuclearization is complete
War Games in the area will stop
American Observers will be in NK during denuclearization
Human Rights were discussed
Remains of American Soldiers will be brought home

Guest Robert Charles former Assistant Sec State for Bush 43 was on Varney - got my attention because I heard some words which I have become familiar with from Q work. But he did make some good points, so here are some of my notes on what he said:

He was explaining that people in general will be happy with the agreement, although some might refer to it as “Crumbs” [in the way Pelosi has belittled the tax cuts]

He goes on to say that this President has the ability to look ahead in the ways others can’t. He articulated the possible and put that vision in front of people and created concentric circles of buy in for it. What he did with Kim was to create a Win-Win situation. He has empowered Kim Jong Un the way Ronald Reagan empowered Gorbachev to be a transformative figure.

Will Kim actually pursue that? When you are pulling someone out of “Darkness into LIght” there’s a lot of blinking, there’s recoil and there will undoubtedly be stops and starts, but this is a significant turn for the world in the right direction, and I think every American should be happy this morning…

There was a blurb of the interview Hannity did with Trump which will be shown tonight.

Varney asks how the denuclearization verification will take place.

Charles replies, “that is the 100 million dollar question. At the end of the day implementation is everything. You can’t get to implementation without a Plan, and you can’t get to a Plan without a shared vision. So where are we? We are at the shared vision point. Verification will have to include really blanketing the country to get in to the Key sites, the military sites, which is probably why Iran looks at this and says ‘wow I can’t believe NK is going to do this.”

“ At the end of the day NK gets 2 things out of this. They get security guarantees and a path to an economic future. At the end of the day, what Kim Jong Un, who is a lot smarter than I think a lot of people realize, has figured out that wagging nuclear weapons at the world is almost literally a dead end street. So you have to look back at where you want to reverse engineer yourself into a more promising future. You are going to have to start somewhere.

The beautiful thing here is this is the only time in his lifetime when this would have actually been a possitiliby. Donald Trumps don’t come along very often. We have the beginning of trust.”

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Varney and the next guest Larry O’Conner (a radio commentator) made the point that the press was not that hostile in the press conference. The guest says that he thinks they got caught up in the historical nature of it and were blind-sided by it. They weren’t expecting it.

Other guests were commenting on Trump’s patience and ability to strategize for the long term. The press, as Varney was pointing out, may be having some changes.

Trust the Plan

Enjoy the Show

[generally]

Yes, that’s Seth Rich.

[Okeydoker]

Great pics.

[TruthWillWin]

[Melian]

According to news reports, Seth Rich used the nickname/code name Panda. But that plaque is about him and it says “Friend to all, including Panda”. Odd.

[Steven W.]

Panda was SR’s personal taken nickname - it was interspersed among numerous things dug through after 187. There was also an early ref to WikiLeaks having obtained DNC things from a “bear” - via Kim Dotcom, I think, probably the only thing he’s ever said that proved correct, which most assumed “bear” meant Russians, but “bear” = “Panda” = SR.

[Steven W.]

Panda was SR’s personal taken nickname - it was interspersed among numerous things dug through after 187. There was also an early ref to WikiLeaks having obtained DNC things from a “bear” - via Kim Dotcom, I think, probably the only thing he’s ever said that proved correct, which most assumed “bear” meant Russians, but “bear” = “Panda” = SR.

[meyer]

Nice summary of Robert Charles on the Varney show. I think that’s the most realistic I’ve heard. I did not see it, so I appreciate you taking notes and presenting them here.

Certainly better than the whiney Ben Shapiro on F&F this morning. He seemed to be angry that Trump even met with KJU!

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

In homo-speak, large, somewhat unfit gay men are known as “bears”.

I think Kim DotCom would fit that vocable while SR would not. And, yes, Pandas are bears. But, “bears” are not always Pandas.

[LuvFreeRepublic]

First video. Dark to light.........chills.

[TruthWillWin]

Nice summary of Robert Charles on the Varney show. I think that’s the most realistic I’ve heard. I did not see it, so I appreciate you taking notes and presenting them here.

X2

[Steven W.]

Thanks for the link to the North Korea video prepared for & presented to Kim - “what if?” ;)

[Jack Black]

Thanks. That makes sense.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

And then, there is THIS bear!

[dfwgator]

I liked him better as "Fly Guy"...

[Red Badger]

Apparently RR is at the epicenter of everything, and he’s still digging the hole...........................

[edzo4]

New Q 'proof'

Trump says he and Kim spoke already.

President Donald Trump sat down for an exclusive one-on-one with ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos after the president's summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Tuesday in Singapore.

George Stephanopoulos: Mr. President, thanks for doing this.
President Trump: Thank you very much.

G: So we saw you sign the agreement right in this room. You also said you developed a special bond with Kim. Describe that bond.
T: Well, it’s been a very intense day, and as you know, we discussed things over the last few months.

G: You did? You’ve spoken with him before?
T: Yeah, I have spoken, yes, I have spoken to him, I have spoken to a lot of his people, his, as you know, his, I would say very top person was at the White House last week. And so we’ve developed a pretty good relationship in terms of getting something done. It got done. I think it’s a terrific document. It’s a starter, but it’s a terrific document. I think far more -- and there are things that we negotiated after that document that are also very important.

March 10
Q post #918

I swear Trump is killing me here. HAHA He keeps putting out clues he has already talked to Kim

Mar 10 2018 14:05:58 (EST)

You are learning.
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible?
Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.
Q