|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 07/03/2018 10:12:09 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan” YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview Article Conservative Treehouse Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview Anonymous What is Q? - 31 point introduction Anonymous The Book of Q - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary “Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board “The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More” YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected - 6 min Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Nice new Masthead!
What a dollface and a great American.
Bagster
Memos detail FBI’s ‘Hurry the F up pressure’ to probe Trump campaign
Some highlights
Multiple reviews of whether FBI agents’ political bias affected the Russia-Trump collusion case remain in their infancy, but investigators already have unearthed troubling internal communications long withheld from public view.
Memos the FBI is now producing to the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general and multiple Senate and House committees offer what sources involved in the production, review or investigation describe to me as “damning” or “troubling” evidence.
They show Strzok and his counterintelligence team rushing in the fall of 2016 to find “derogatory” information from informants or a “pretext” to accelerate the probe and get a surveillance warrant on figures tied to the future president.
“Crossfire Hurricane” was one of the code names for four separate investigations the FBI conducted related to Russia matters in the 2016 election.
“At a minimum, that keeps the hurry the F up pressure on him,” Strzok emailed Page on Oct. 14, 2016, less than four weeks before Election Day.
Four days later the same team was emailing about rushing to get approval for another FISA warrant for another Russia-related investigation code-named “Dragon.”
“Still an expedite?” one of the emails beckoned, as the FBI tried to meet the requirements of a process known as a Woods review before a FISA warrant can be approved by the courts.
“Any idea what time he can have it woods-ed by?” Strzok asked Page. “I know it’s not going to matter because DOJ is going to take the time DOJ wants to take. I just don’t want this waiting on us at all.”
The day after Trump’s surprising win on Nov. 9, 2016, the FBI counterintelligence team engaged in a new mission, bluntly described in another string of emails prompted by another news leak.
“We need ALL of their names to scrub, and we should give them ours for the same purpose,” Strzok emailed Page on Nov. 10, 2016, citing a Daily Beast article about some of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s allegedly unsavory ties overseas.
“Andy didn’t get any others,” Page wrote back, apparently indicating McCabe didn’t have names to add to the “scrub.”
“That’s what Bill said,” Strzok wrote back, apparently referring to then-FBI chief of counterintelligence William Priestap. “I suggested we need to exchange our entire lists as we each have potential derogatory CI info the other doesn’t.” CI is short for confidential informants.
It’s an extraordinary exchange, if for no other reason than this: The very day after Trump wins the presidency, some top FBI officials are involved in the sort of gum-shoeing normally reserved for field agents, and their goal is to find derogatory information about someone who had worked for the president-elect.
As the president-elect geared up to take over, the FBI made another move that has captured investigators’ attention: It named an executive with expertise in the FBI’s most sensitive surveillance equipment to be a liaison to the Trump transition.
On its face, that seems odd; technical surveillance nerds aren’t normally the first picks for plum political assignments. Even odder, the FBI counterintelligence team running the Russia-Trump collusion probe seemed to have an interest in the appointment.
Yet, now, irrefutable proof exists that agents sought to create pressure to get “derogatory” information and a “pretext” to interview people close to a future president they didn’t like.
Clear evidence also exists that an investigation into still-unproven collusion between a foreign power and a U.S. presidential candidate was driven less by secret information from Moscow and more by politically tainted media leaks.
And that means the dots between expressions of political bias and official actions just got a little more connected.
LoL!
Well I'm slipping already this AM, saw your comment and responded then saw the Airplane scene. Shoulda known it would have appeared before morning.
First rule of book club. Don't talk about book club.
Bad edzo
Bagster
And some begin with M.
Bagster
:)
Bagster
that’s not an answer...
you people are like the cast of “Lost” talking about “The Island”- no one knows what it is but that’s all they care about
You got it out of the way early.
The rest of the day...perfection.
Bagster
QOVFEFE™
QOVFEFE™
QOVFEFE™
You have to understand also, that the bluster and the insults are The Asian Way of negotiation, and Mr. Trump may be the first one that has done the diplomatic dance the way it’s supposed to be done.
For me, I suspect Mr. Kim has never been the ogre he’s been portrayed as being in our lugenpresse. Just as dear President Trump is not what they portray him as.
From your post to God’s ear!
Well, look at you bags! All fancied up.
Thanks for the stylish report.
Hope Q drops about Paperclip & May/Merkel/Warren today.
Yes! The Oracle is beautiful. Thank you Mairdie for giving Bagster such formal duds. He cleans up real nice under your most excellent styling :)
QOVFEFE™
An epic post. Should be an op ed in the Oracle.
Just for the record, I’m impatient about many things, but in my post about the lack of news on no name’s resignation, I wasn’t expressing impatience; I was expressing an interest in the odd lack of any news from no name. He is conspicuous by his absence. Along with the Podesta brothers and a few others.
I was thinking that if we are bored and beginning to bicker with no crumbs to decode, it might be an interesting project to try to make a list of conspicuously absent people. This would be more difficult than looking for info on specified individuals. We would be looking for the ABSENCE of info on non-specified individuals.
In intel work, as sudden increase in chatter is significant. So is a sudden absence.
Anybody up for the task?
I’d suggest the following steps:
1. Make a list of prominent people
1. a. US Politicians
1. b. Hollywood celebrities
1. c. Celebrity CEOs.
1. d-z. Many other categories, including international
2. Find a tool that can graph mentions of someone/something in the news against time. Or that can graph google searches against time. Pretty sure I’ve seen such a thing. I’ll assign myself the task to find it (if anyone wants to join me in this project).
3. Start graphing the people in part 1 using the tool in part 2.
4. Note anomalies.
5. Investigate the anomalies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
