As far as Sessions goes, he only recused himself from Trump related-Russia stuff. Here is his statement: “Having concluded those meetings today, I have decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any matters related in any way to the campaigns for President of the United States." He didn't recuse himself from all the other things...only things related to the campaign. What Q is speaking about is totally outside of the scope of his recusal.
Finally-The military courts: I haven't followed this too much on the Q threads. BUT...I have seen it some of the discussion on it. I do not believe that these discussions are correct. American citizens, even tried for treason, are not (I believe) going to be tried by military tribunals and held at Gitmo...unless they are currently in the military. Kawakita v. United States was a treason case and it was tried in civilian court. Even the Rosenbergs were not tried by a military tribunal (even though it was espionage not treason). I cannot see Hillary, Bill, Holder, or any of the others being put in Gitmo and tried before military courts (as some Q threads suggest or state outright) being tried in this way. It would cause a constitutional crisis in this country. I, for one, would have a severe problem with it. American citizens that are not in the military, have constitutional rights. These Q threads seem to indicate they will lose some of that. If these delusions are actual reality, we will see chaos.
...SESSIONS:
...I believe the proper thing for me to do, would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and that were raised during the campaign or to be otherwise connected to it.
GRASSLEY:
OK. I think, that’s — let me emphasize then with a follow up question. To be very clear, you intend to recuse yourself from both the Clinton e-mail investigation and any matters involving the Clinton Foundation, if there are any?
SESSIONS:
Yes...
(shrugs)