Posters suggested George Nader. A wavetop dig at Wiki seems like it's pretty solid.
Worked in several administrations, both parties, foreign 'businessman', prior child sex crimes.
Anyone know where he's being held?
You bring up an interesting point. I think a LOT of these Federal cases were either started (months?) after inauguration, or were fired up again after languishing under the corruption of Holder, Lynch and others.
I think there's been a lot of justice being restored behind the scenes. A complex Federal case like this (Epstein) was in the round file under at least the past three administrations.
Trump comes on the scene (with Sessions) and blam! Two years later above-the-law Epstein is arrested. And his houses raided before he even has time to clear out the evidence. No warning. No leaks.
Anyone who's followed trials knows that a case like this, against a person like this, is not cobbled together in a few months.
Posters suggested George Nader. A wavetop dig at Wiki seems like it's pretty solid.
Worked in several administrations, both parties, foreign 'businessman', prior child sex crimes.
Anyone know where he's being held?
>>And his houses raided before he even has time to clear out the evidence.
Aha!!! That line sparked an idea...
I wondered in a post in the previous thread why JE might be bold enough to show up in the US when it’s highly likely he knew that he was in danger of arrest. It seemed a reckless and foolish move.
What if he took the risk of coming back because he (and/or those involved) desperately needed to get the evidence or destroy it? That would totally make sense.
Some guesses:
1. He might have been ordered to destroy it. (by whoever is above him, by peers?)
2. He might have wanted access to it in order to use as leverage. Probably not leverage for a deal. (NO DEALS!) But probably leverage to use against those who might turn on him. Or those who he wants to extract $ from.