Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Theyre not 125 million years old.


17 posted on 09/24/2021 8:26:53 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

Yep, no mention of the unlikelihood that organic material would remain if the sample was truly 125M years old.


18 posted on 09/24/2021 9:20:56 PM PDT by jonno (You are the carbon they want to reduce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

They seem to keep finding more fossils with cellular intact components. Ever since Mary Schweitzer first published her findings. Apparently they didn’t think anything like that could remain intact after 60 to 100 million years....one hypothesis is that the specimens may not be that old..degradation kinetics suggest they cannot be that old. Definitely a conundrum for those who cannot refute degradation rates of biomolecules.


19 posted on 09/24/2021 9:30:12 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson