Virus Prophylaxis and Treatment

Twitter | 4/22/24 | CharlesOconnell

[griffin]

Yeah, you’re wrong.

Dersion is it’s own tool.

And you’re acting like a tool to stick up for a pos poster who advocates pro-fauci, pro-jab, and contributing garbage that doesnt even relate to the intent of the thread.

So, feel free to carry its water and buy books for drag queen story hour and hand abortionists their instrument.

Good job. Be proud, fungus soldier!

[griffin]

Nah, your crap and your camp just flat out kills people. But, oh, you get your depends in a little bunch when people start to get mean.

Your camp has been roundly discredited. Only mindless liberals believe your lies. You’re just embarassing yourself and looking like a fool to continue.

THIS THREAD ISNT A PLACE FOR YOUR SCREED. NO ONE THAT READS THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD, CLICKS ON IT, IS COMING HERE TO EAT UP YOUR PRO-FAUCI CRAP. YOU DONT KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE. GIVE IT UP.

[Fury]

Uh, okay.

Good luck.

[Pelham]

I’ll bet that the vast majority of your loyal fan club have no idea about your Daily Expose post claimimg that “the Covid virus doesn’t exist!”

Yet that’s the core belief of your fantasy world. The Covid virus “doesn’t exist” and all of the illness was caused by “poisonous vaccines” administered before 2020.

It amuses me how you’re too embarrassed to repost that gem.

Why is that? Do you no longer believe it? Or do you think reposting it would make too many freepers start wondering about your sanity?

[exDemMom]

THIS THREAD ISNT A PLACE FOR YOUR SCREED.

Any place that people are using to spread deadly medical misinformation is a place where scientists such as myself have a moral obligation to counter the lies and try to educate people.

If you were able to refute anything I have posted based on solid scientific evidence, you would have done so already.

You do realize that your basic premise, that all scientists are liars who spend their days thinking of new ways to fool people instead of doing research is absolutely ludicrous, don't you?

[grey_whiskers]

You’re a liar.

First, about yourself. You pretended you were still on a first-name basis with Dr. Malone.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4192248/posts?page=65#65

Second, about Malone. He’s not a charlatan.

Third, about me. I don’t have a lack of knowledge of grad school.
You accused me of it to throw a cloud of ink in the water, to cover getting called out on your lie that you had read thousands of papers (by implication, in their entirety) in grad school. And to backpedal on your initial bluff that you were on a first’name basis with Malone.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4192354/posts?page=98#98

Quote about grad school from that post:

This is only a selection of textbooks. In the course of getting my undergraduate then my PhD degrees, I had to take physics, classes on several types of chemistry, statistics, biology, genetics, and mathematics up through calculus. Yes, I did read all of the textbooks linked here, as well as many others. This represents six years of classroom instruction (four undergrad and two grad level). Since a STEM PhD degree is awarded on the basis of laboratory research designed to add to previous research, I have also read thousands of research papers.

Note the last sentence.

Dingbat.

[jjotto]

Serially killers gonna serial kill.

They claim somehow it’s not their fault.

[grey_whiskers]

And quercetin and (H)CQ are different enough to tell me that they do not interact with the same targets. Look at those structures. The CQ has a chlorine side group, which is negatively charged, but it contains three nitrogens that are positively charged. Thus, it has an overall positive +2 charge. The addition of the hydroxy group to make HCQ reduces the charge to +1 and makes it more water soluble. On the other hand, the quercetin has five hydroxy groups and two other oxygen atoms, giving it an overall negative charge of -7. Chemically, those negative charges mean that it cannot interact with the same targets that the positively charged (H)CQ interacts with. And if they are not interacting with the same targets, they are not interchangeable.

Nice redirection and/or sleight of hand.

There is no requirement that they work bythe same mechanism. Idiot.

[grey_whiskers]

There's another way to avoid infection: if one's innate immune system handles the virus well enough that adaptive immunity does not get ramped up. YMMV, this is something which can be predicted ab initio.

[exDemMom]

You’re a liar.

Can you factually refute anything I have ever said?

You can't. That's why you resort to insults and ad hominems.

I either provide references for every scientific fact I post or provide them after someone tries to call me out. Since I am so open about my sources, it should be a simple matter to look at them and identify how I have lied about them--if I am, in fact, lying. But since I take information accurately from the sources, no one yet has ever been able to refute me.

Why do you have a hard time believing that a scientist reads thousands of papers? Just because they're too technical for you to read doesn't mean that scientists can't read them. For us, it only takes a few minutes to read a paper. In its entirety.

[exDemMom]

There is no requirement that they work bythe same mechanism. Idiot.

My explanation was a little too technical for you, was it?

[grey_whiskers]

There are only two ways to prevent catching a viral disease. One way is to completely avoid exposure. If the virus spreads through the respiratory route, the only surefire way to avoid exposure is to stay indoors where all the air is filtered. The other way is to get vaccinated. This way depends on how well your immune system functions (if you have a disease that impairs immune function, you won't be as protected), but it gives you a great deal of freedom as compared to remaining in isolation.

You're wrong. WAY early in this episode, the spouses of many of those infected, on board the cruise ship Diamond Princess, shared the exact same cabins, could not have been jabbed since the jabs didn't exist yet, but never got sick.

Dingbat.

[grey_whiskers]

No.

You're trying to troll me to cover for the fact that your implicit major premise, was a lie.

Keep on trolling, Dingbat. It's amusing trying to watch you pull "proof by credentialism" and "Because SCIENCE!"^TM to people who have already figured out your entire position is a lie.

[grey_whiskers]

They’re not too technical for me.

You’re projecting your own low intellectual ceiling onto others.

See your earlier post about “statistics, several kinds of chemistry, and calculus”
somehow conveying prestige.

They bore me because I know they are in the service of a lie.

What you don’t get, or admit, is that merely yanking someone’s funding does not remove their scientific skill or acumen; and that peer review fails of its essential purpose (see the recent scandals both Stanford and IIRC Dana Farber on falsified results, there are plenty of others); and finally, failure to appear in peer review is not the strong evidence of quackery which you portray it to be.

[grey_whiskers]

And you gloat because you are her controller.

[grey_whiskers]

The safest way to take vitamin D is on the advice of your doctor who tells you an appropriate dose based on your serum levels.

Ka-ching!!

It's not safe to take mega doses of vitamin D (or anything else) just because you read something on the internet or saw it in some "health guru" book.

"Y'all are not a horse. Seriously, stop it."

[grey_whiskers]

Disease-induced immunity is not as broad or protective as vaccine-induced immunity. In addition, no immunity against coronaviruses lasts for more than a few months. Ever catch a cold, then another cold, then another cold? You keep catching them because immunity is not permanent.

So this is another permanent revenue stream for Pfizer, for everybody, two or three times a year for the rest of their lives.

But of course we know they are all acting slowly out of pure concerns for mankind.

Dingbat.

[grey_whiskers]

My sympathy & condolences to you, Myrddin.

As Theoden King said, no parent should have to bury his child.

[grey_whiskers]

Please explain to me how medical misinformation is a fundamentally conservative position.

Trivially. The word "misinformation" was appropriated, weaponized, and applied by leftists: who were following Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels' advice "always accuse your opponents of that which you are guilty."

Those pushing against the Pfauci narrative have lost a lot of money, prestige, and professional standing. Pfizer and Moderna have made tens/hundreds of billions. Money corrupts.

[grey_whiskers]

There aren’t even ashes left of her argument or credibility at this point.

Well done!