Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rudy45
IBM PC vs. Apple's Macintosh

It took Microsoft 5 years to catch up to the Macintosh.

2 posted on 01/13/2003 3:15:32 PM PST by RossA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RossA
Right on. If you want a great analysis of why the Wintel systems achieved dominance, read John Sculley's book, Odyssey (written when he was hot); he describes the argument he and Steve Jobs had about price points for the Mac (Sculley won).

What are you studying?
12 posted on 01/13/2003 3:19:58 PM PST by staylowandkeepmoving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RossA
Zenith PC beat out by IBM PC. The Zenith had dual processors, a Z80 and a full 8086. Much better hardware and documentation too.

The original IBM PC's detestable "CGA" graphic standard beat out the advanced mix of mapped and raster color graphics that the DEC Rainbow PC demonstrated commercially. Took ten years to come back to where things could have been from the start.

Fortran 77 beat APL.

Piston gasoline engines beat out Steamers.

28 posted on 01/13/2003 3:27:17 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RossA
60's BeeGees vs Disco BeeGees ("Gotta Get A Message To You," "To Love Somebody" etc were great songs, but all they're remembered for is "Stayin' Alive." Yuck!
80 posted on 01/13/2003 3:57:37 PM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RossA
The Commodore Amiga was far superior to either Mac or PC.
109 posted on 01/14/2003 9:18:52 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson