Posted on 02/27/2003 6:18:03 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
My first post on this forum was in relation to the initial Nasa Press Conference after the horrible disaster. I said that the Director's response to questions asked made me think he was hiding something. I said he was side-stepping the issues asked about. I cited my experience as an attorney and the thousands and thousands of questions/answers I had experience in tense legal situations.
I was flamed over and over again. My registration date was cited to attack my opinion. My profession as a lawyer was cited to attack me personally and my opinion.
The moderator even removed my post. "Comment #129 Removed by Moderator" http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/833981/posts?q=1&&page=101
I wrote "It wouldn't be the first time someone in a government-funded program or agency skirted the truth in order to justify their mistakes, or to avoid negative fallout.
I don't know what he knows or doesn't know. All I know is what I heard in the press conference. And, as someone who has professional experience in Question and Answer sessions dealing with serious or touchy subjects, I'm just trying to offer my reaction to his response.
Noone asked him if tiles could be repaired. All that was asked was if Nasa had considered a spacewalk to investigate the impact that occurred during launch.
His answer was totally defensive. Between several of his responses, the "theme" was "Nothing could have been done to repair tile damage" - I don't believe that for a minute. Regardless, who cares if it couldn't have been repaired? That is NO justification for failing to fully investigate before re-entry.
158 posted on 02/01/2003 2:08 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh"
People like "steveegg" called me a "trial lawyer troll since 2/1/03" etc. Typical Freeper response to a new person who dares to suggest that someone did something wrong. (Unless that someone was a liberal or foreigner or a non-conservative etc)
Well, the emails show that Nasa knew DAYS before the re-entry that there was a problem, that there was potential for a catastrophic left wheel/wing failure. And they didn't do jack squat about it. They let those 7 heroes come back and "crossed their fingers" hoping that the Red-Flag was wrong.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/nasaemail1.html
You know what? This isn't the first time that I have been personally attacked and flamed for showing up with an unpopular opinion or forecast.
Remember the Bush-Gore election? I was the first person on this forum, or ANY forum for that matter, who posted a warning that Gore was going to attempt to selectively challenge vote tallies in heavily democratic areas, and that Gore might WIN the election by doing that.
AND I WAS RIGHT.
And I got flamed and insulted and called every bad name in the book - until, of course, I was proved right over the next 24-48 hours after that post.
Want the proof? http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/111000-04.htm
----------------------------------
For any of you who would like to apologize for how you flamed me, insulted me, and called me names, attacking me personally for the posts I made calling into question the Nasa director's evasive responses, and my conclusion that they did something wrong and that they KNEW, please feel free.
For those of you who don't feel like it, at least maybe you will commit to thinking before you type next time. Because, I for one, am ashamed of many of the self-described "conservatives" on this website who are so close-minded, so quick to defend ANYTHING that they deem patriotic or conservative, that you end up embarassing yourself, and the true conservative ideology.
May God Bless the 7 heroes who died, and their families, and may we rise to the occasion, and fix what we did wrong, fix the ineptitude and idiocy that led to their senseless and avoidable deaths.
I was flamed over and over again. My registration date was cited to attack my opinion. My profession as a lawyer was cited to attack me personally and my opinion."
Oh my..
PS:
Hey, what's black and brown and looks great on an attorney?
And...
Remember the Bush-Gore election? I was the first person on this forum, or ANY forum for that matter, who posted a warning that Gore was going to attempt to selectively challenge vote tallies in heavily democratic areas, and that Gore might WIN the election by doing that.
Hmmm.
Truth backs you up, even when 400 falsifiers jump all over you. Have more faith in that.
Stick around, don' bear a grudge, and don't vainly complain. Bear with it.
You weren't the only one reamed by the pack mentality those days -- there were many, maybe most, a few who spoke and many scared to silence. You were bold, and I hope you can keep it up.
I didn't flame you, insult you or call you names. I'm sorry some did. Hang in there. I appreciate your input.
You know what? This isn't the first time that I have been personally attacked and flamed for showing up with an unpopular opinion or forecast. Remember the Bush-Gore election? I was the first person on this forum, or ANY forum for that matter, who posted a warning that Gore was going to attempt to selectively challenge vote tallies in heavily democratic areas, and that Gore might WIN the election by doing that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.