Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future Democrat Chairmen Voting Against Gerry Studds' Censure
Congressional Record | Self

Posted on 10/04/2006 12:21:41 PM PDT by GOPFlack

July 20, 1983, roll call vote 259, House of Representatives, Motion to Censure Congressman Gerry Studds (D-MA) -

Following future Dem House Committee Chairs voting "no" -

Conyers, Frank, Lantos, Miller, Obey, Rahall, and Waxman.

Leadership voting "no"

Hoyer

Chair of DSCC, then House member, Schumer "no"

Voted instead for a watered down reprimand.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: asshats; democrats; dnc; foley; hipocrit; liberals; mdm; stubbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: edsheppa

They voted against increasing the punishment from a reprimand to a censure (a reprimand does not even require the "bad guy" to be present for the reprimand, while a censure requires them to be in 'the well' and rebuked and humiliated)

When it came down to it, the 3 in my post voted against the censure altogether.

So the original post is voting against censure as a more severe punishment, mine was voting against the censure they agreed to pursue as a punishment.

I think that's right.


41 posted on 10/04/2006 1:37:13 PM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GOPFlack

Excellent find. Send to our talk radio guys, it is great and useful information.


42 posted on 10/04/2006 1:39:15 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa

No, he said Schumer and others voted against Censure. The rest of the House voted to censure Stubbs and it passed. but Schumer and some other DEM sleaze voted against it.


43 posted on 10/04/2006 1:40:36 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa

vote 259 - Gingrich motion for censure as opposed to committee resolution for reprimand. Passed, with 87 nays which included those listed above.


44 posted on 10/04/2006 1:40:57 PM PDT by GOPFlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; GOPFlack

Somehow I think "they voted for censure but would have preferred a reprimand" isn't quite the damning indictment GOPFlack was trying for.


45 posted on 10/04/2006 1:41:15 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
He's a cook! Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
46 posted on 10/04/2006 1:41:26 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa

They voted to kill the censure resolution, which was the key vote. The underlying bill was a reprimand reported by the Ethics Committee. It was amended with censure by Gingrich on a contested vote. Everyone then rolled over on final passage after Gingrich won that key vote.


47 posted on 10/04/2006 1:44:56 PM PDT by GOPFlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GOPFlack; Welike ike
That kind of misinformation makes our side look bad. Assuming the other poster is right about the final vote, it is basically a lie to claim they opposed censure when they voted for it in the end.

Now maybe you can make some hay out of the fact that they preferred a reprimand to censure, but I doubt it.

48 posted on 10/04/2006 1:49:06 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa

I have no idea how that is disinformation. They flat voted against it. Bills pass almost all the time with near unanimity on final passage but the key votes are in the amendment.

For example, in the defense bill, if someone votes to cancel missile defense, but loses the vote, and then votes for final passage on the overall bill that has missile defense in it, does that mean they supported missile defense? Hardly.


49 posted on 10/04/2006 1:58:46 PM PDT by GOPFlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa

Ed, maybe you are right. I think many Conservative bloggers and posters are just so frustrated with the lack of fighting back by the GOP right now. If you cannot nail a easy target like San Francisco Socialist Pelosi, who can you target?


50 posted on 10/04/2006 2:01:03 PM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GOPFlack
I have no idea how that is disinformation.

I know. That blindness is one of the least attractive traits among you 'bots.

51 posted on 10/04/2006 2:04:32 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike
many Conservative bloggers and posters are just so frustrated with the lack of fighting back by the GOP right now

You've got that right. But it's also more than that. It's the lack of foresight too. What school child hasn't heard that where there's smoke there's fire? But I guess that aphorism is unknown to the Congressional R leadership.

52 posted on 10/04/2006 2:10:52 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; Gay State Conservative
I was once in Studds district, for years actually.

During election time, someone(s) took a can of red spray paint and did the o slash circle thing on what seemed like every single Studds sign in the district.

I enjoyed that a lot, but the fact is, that most of my neighbors were voting for that POS.

I will never understand that phenomenon.

Studds finally resigned, or whatever, but for reasons incomprehensible to me, was never defeated in an election after he was first elected to congress.
53 posted on 10/04/2006 2:12:49 PM PDT by Radix (Due to time constraints, I can for the time being not review my pings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DontBelieveAugPolls

what prompted that comment to me? No one care about what? and get over what?


54 posted on 10/04/2006 2:26:39 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Liberals would let Mark Foley be a Boy Scout leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Democrats feel no shame because they have no conscience. Moral values aren't very important to them, I guess. What hypocrites.


55 posted on 10/04/2006 2:35:54 PM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

ping


56 posted on 10/04/2006 8:04:07 PM PDT by zip (((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson