Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
like the liberals, you demand only "acceptable means" to discuss the issue

I don't understand your vilification of the rules of engagement, civility, evidence, logic and reason. Are these not within your parameters of discussion?

50 posted on 03/29/2005 9:21:45 AM PST by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - do the research, contact your legislators, get this puppy passed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: BerthaDee

Bumping Drango's "Ignore 'em" post.


55 posted on 03/29/2005 9:23:44 AM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: BerthaDee

"Engagement"? This thread is a plea for disengagement!

"Civility?"

You mean like the post #9, which told me, quote, "go f*ck yourself"?

Is that the civility that you're talking about?

Evidence? Like the mountains of documentation pointing to foul play and judicial corruption? The evidence that a woman is being starved to death in the United States of America by order of the government? The Death-to-Terri crowd has been dogmatically ignoring evidence throughout this debate.

Reason? As in religiously adhering to the judgement of the "rule of law" even when it is eminently provable that not only was the law not followed in this case, but rather made up by the judge entirely based on his own discretion?

Logic? As in the logic that says starving someone to death is not the same as murdering them?


Clean your own house, first, and then maybe I'll take those arguments seriously.


81 posted on 03/29/2005 9:29:33 AM PST by thoughtomator (Order "Judges Gone Wild!" Only $19.95 have your credit card handy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson