Posted on 04/12/2005 1:11:23 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
And I'm not going to hijack this one in order to give you a platform to wave the Stars & Bars around, either.
BTW, you still haven't fixed that sig line.
He did have those pesky arrests though.
Hell, even the book "A Beautiful Mind" discussed his homosexuality.
I'm not asking you to hijack anything...just wondering what was the compelling reason was to "preserve the union"
I understand if you can't answer because...there really is no answer
Better not to think about it and just keep believing the Honest Avenging Abe grade school myth.
There you go, you got it.
In one of my English lit class the professor was constantly throwing a homosexual slant on every story we read. It really got to be sickening.
As a gay man and a gay journalist I say that there was no such thing as gay when Abraham Lincoln was alive. There were only men, sodomites, and dead sodomites. I can assure them all that Abraham Lincoln was not one of the latter two. I'm not really a gay man and a gay journalist but I think its funny when people talk like that.
They are so screwed up:
ADMIT YOU'RE GAY OR WE'LL OUT YOU! WE'RE YOUR PEOPLE! WE'LL KILL YOU. WE LOVE YOU. KILL YOU. LOVE YOU. KILL. LOVE. KILL. LOVE. LOVE. KILL.... ARRRRRRGH!
Don´t bother, his tag line says it all.
Yep, I was thinking the exact same thing. Not worth one more keystroke of my time.
You'll enjoy this post.
They cancelled Phil Hendri in Houston more than a year ago and I'm still pissed.
I understand that they have also found articles in the Washington papers of the day talking about his constantly being in the company of one particular person (a body guard?). But they do not take into consideration that the comments made had no 'Gay" implications, as they are now trying to advocate.
Napoleon?
Anyone wanna bet that Wlat gallop up from Georgia to attend this thing?
Exactly. They've been at it for at least 20 years but only now are they getting attention from anyone other than liberal kooks and other homosexuals.
cad (kAd) n. A man whose behavior is unprincipled or dishonorable.
Someone who is morally reprehensible.
A person who behaves crudely or dishonorably.
An ill-bred man.
A person lacking in finer feelings.
A lowbred, presuming person; a mean, vulgar fellow.
One who is morally reprehensible.
A villian, scoundrel, wicked or evil person; someone who does evil deliberately
Synonyms: bounder, blackguard, dog, hound, heel
IOW, aside from Non-Sequitur, he's about the most appropriately named person on this entire forum!
Let's see..."GOPcapitalist." "GOP": a poster who spends the vast majority of his time slandering the first Republican president - check. "capitalist": said poster also lavishes nostalgic adoration on the slave labor economy of the vanquished Confederacy - check.
Reality: "GOPcapitalist" is neither. But he is a troll of some sort; he's managed to avoid the ZOTTED status so many of his racist compadres have managed to attain thus far. But that pointy-headed mask will slip just a little too far one day, I have no doubt, and "GOPcapitalist" will earn the ZOT he so richly deserves.
Just FYI. SSDD.
LMAO--this is a joke! If they want to make public fools of themselves, let them.
They'll never 'out' Hitler because only POSITIVE historical figures could have been gay, dontcha know...
So where is nolu chan when you really need him? He used to eat this shit up, had links from every "Lincoln is a homo" website known to modern man. Are you going to take up his cause in his unlamented absence?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.