Posted on 11/19/2005 11:37:00 PM PST by nickcarraway
"You said Catholic schools produce fine students."
Actually, that's not what I said. LOL.
If they would be SO diligent in policying courses AT UNIVERSITIES, like the crap courses taught by Mr. Churchill AT COLORADO.
Facts is they won't admit that the persons making these judgement have a viewpont which will allow acceptance of "gender-studies" courses, which purely ideological in character.
My son was homeschooled. We typed up his transcript ourselves, which the University of Missouri knew. It listed only subjects taken, no specifics and no grades (except for three classes he had taken online through the University of Missouri). He did well on his ACT (27) and was admitted without any problems. He graduated from Mizzou last spring.
Reasonable paraphrase. LOL.
The school did not ask where I was employed.
Go ahead and teach your children the earth is flat for all I care. Creationism is a myth not science. If you want your child to get into MIT and other top schools they need to learn real science not Bob Jones pseudosceince.
BTW you call me a facist illustrating what a complete ignorant fool that you are. I donate gobs of dollars to fundamentalist christian schools and charitable organizations. Likely more than your primate paycheck will ever see.
No. As a matter of fact I send my kids to a Christian school.
"Gobs" is a technical term. I believe it is slightly more than "oodles" but less than "tons of."
Ugh, a large portion of everything is currently being outsourced to India and China! Ever call a computer "help line" (now there's a euphemism)?
The headline should read "University Is Accused of Bias Against SOME Christian Schools."
Graduation from, say, the Unitarian/Mennonite Free School of Social Conscience in Marin County would probably result in instant admission even if the grad could not read or write, or, indeed, tie his own shoes (a culturally biased test of skill, doncha know).
"The school did not ask where I was employed."
Like they had to ask.
LOL. In the future I'll try to be more precise in my word choice.
I just figured this thread was getting a little heavy...needed to lighten up a bit.
So, are you willing to posit an actual questiion, or do you simply plan to keep trying your deflective pompassity? Your premise is faulty. There is no winner by default.
I have a theory. You have a theory. God will let us know who wins! In the end, it doesn't really matter, except to some of us, who believe in a future eternity. Apparently you don't.
You want to be the authority. You're not. You're just another crackpot that wants to play at being a god... and deny His existence. Go sit in your ivory tower, if you think it will keep you safe.
If you choose not to believe something, you have the right. Just don't expect everybody else to accept your own beliefs. As one who posits his trust in science, then secience will keep your bones.
Some people do think with their hearts. That is the essence of Christian morality. It is defined by a higher calling, only heard by those, with an affinity for God's Spirit. Calling us mystics, or relating our beliefs to a misunderstanding of science, is an affront to an awful lot of like-minded people. I guess that is the way a professor might look at things, from his high and lofty perch.
You can keep restating your amoral relativism, methinks. It's irrelevant, to me!
"Do SAT/ACT tests have questions about faith? If you do well on your tests, it shouldn't matter whether you believe in Jesus or Santa Claus. Plus if you do well on your tests, you can pretty much pick your college.
If a college rejects you because of your faith in Jesus, that would be great sign to go to a Christian college. "
Having been the head of a high school science department I can tell you there is more than SATs to getting into a good college. Their grades are important but the grades are considered in the context of the high school they attended. If the high school is not accredited by a regional association, it's an uphill battle to get into a good school even with good SATs.
"When the UC system stops giving credit for some of the ethnic studies courses taken by high school students, I will take this kind of argument seriously. Even if the Christian high-school courses have low academic value--and I don't know the answer to that one way or the other--the Univ. is engaging in viewpoint discrimination by giving credit for one second-rate course but denying credit for another."
Giving credit for an elective is different than having an unqualified course in a required areas like math or science.
I fail to see where I said any of the things you seem to think I said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.