Skip to comments.
There is no proof that we evolved from apes. Period
the Sunday Telegraph ^
| 9/11/05
| Vij Sodera
Posted on 12/15/2005 9:10:41 AM PST by flevit
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-544 next last
second time, (first one hopefully deleted)
1
posted on
12/15/2005 9:10:42 AM PST
by
flevit
To: flevit
Oh yes there is -- the liberal Democrats!
2
posted on
12/15/2005 9:11:59 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: flevit
He's right - he has not evolved.
3
posted on
12/15/2005 9:12:08 AM PST
by
GSlob
To: flevit
Someone should have checked out talkorigins before writing this. I believe just about every point is soundly refuted there.
To: flevit
I'm no biologist, but I don't think evolutionists claim that humans evolved from apes.
5
posted on
12/15/2005 9:12:46 AM PST
by
BikerNYC
(Modernman should not have been banned.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
6
posted on
12/15/2005 9:13:25 AM PST
by
flevit
To: flevit
There is no proof that we evolved from apes. Period Evidence (if you want proof, try mathematics, photography, or a fine Scotch):
Figure 1.4.4. Fossil hominid skulls. Some of the figures have been modified for ease of comparison (only left-right mirroring or removal of a jawbone). (Images © 2000 Smithsonian Institution.)
(A) Pan troglodytes, chimpanzee, modern
(B) Australopithecus africanus, STS 5, 2.6 My
(C) Australopithecus africanus, STS 71, 2.5 My
(D) Homo habilis, KNM-ER 1813, 1.9 My
(E) Homo habilis, OH24, 1.8 My
(F) Homo rudolfensis, KNM-ER 1470, 1.8 My
(G) Homo erectus, Dmanisi cranium D2700, 1.75 My
(H) Homo ergaster (early H. erectus), KNM-ER 3733, 1.75 My
(I) Homo heidelbergensis, "Rhodesia man," 300,000 - 125,000 y
(J) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Ferrassie 1, 70,000 y
(K) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Chappelle-aux-Saints, 60,000 y
(L) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, Le Moustier, 45,000 y
(M) Homo sapiens sapiens, Cro-Magnon I, 30,000 y
(N) Homo sapiens sapiens, modern
7
posted on
12/15/2005 9:13:32 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: flevit
Only a matter of time before a ping and a wave of defenders of the evolution dogma.
8
posted on
12/15/2005 9:13:40 AM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: EagleUSA
Defensive tackles, gorillas. You do the math. ;)
9
posted on
12/15/2005 9:13:42 AM PST
by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: flevit
I present al franken, as proof that you are in error...
10
posted on
12/15/2005 9:14:21 AM PST
by
InsureAmerica
(Evil? I have many words for it. We are as dust, to them. - v v putin)
To: BikerNYC
I'm no biologist, but ...That's how this article should have begun.
11
posted on
12/15/2005 9:15:16 AM PST
by
rattrap
To: flevit
To: flevit
"And the critically-positioned amino acids at the active sites within enzymes and structural proteins show that the origination of complex proteins by step-wise modifications of supposed ancestral peptides is impossible. In other words, birds have always been birds, whales have always been whales, apes did not evolve into humans, and humans have always been humans. " rubbish
13
posted on
12/15/2005 9:16:13 AM PST
by
Kelly_2000
( Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch)
To: rattrap
14
posted on
12/15/2005 9:17:03 AM PST
by
flevit
To: rattrap
15
posted on
12/15/2005 9:17:03 AM PST
by
BikerNYC
(Modernman should not have been banned.)
To: EagleUSA
My dad used to say we had many relatives that swung by their necks but none that swung by their tails. Silly, I know.
16
posted on
12/15/2005 9:17:22 AM PST
by
svcw
To: flevit
Its impossible to explian the obvious to someone with a closed mind.
Evolution does NOT state we descended from Apes. It states that Apes and men had a common ancestor.
People who refuse to recognize evolution have a Quranic mindset which shuts out the vast amount of evidence which clearly indicates that life DID evolve, that the early fossil record shows very primitive simple life forms, that successive geological deposits have revealed increasingly more complex life forms which bear obvious anatomical resemblence to existing or later forms.
EVEN IF YOU COULD PRODUCE A LIVE ACTION FILM showing evolution occuring over the time span of millions of years, these people would still refute what was unfolding before their eyes.
This is because their objections are rooted in their version of faith, and not in any scientific or logical analysis. They have managed to conviince themselves that:
1) The Bible is in disagreement with evolution
2) Obvioulsy the Bible is correct.
3) Therefore evolution didn't occur.
The holes in this chain of logic have been hashed, re-hashed and re-re-hashed in numerous arguments. There is NOTHING which which change their minds.
17
posted on
12/15/2005 9:18:46 AM PST
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: flevit
18
posted on
12/15/2005 9:18:51 AM PST
by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: svcw
I gotta have a banana and think about that one...
To: Kelly_2000
rubbish Good argument. I know it convinced me.
20
posted on
12/15/2005 9:19:22 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 541-544 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson