Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^ | 17 December 2005 | Kayla Bunge

[eleni121]

Name...State...

So many demands...typical of evo fascists and their mania to maintain power over the public school science classes.

You are so obvious...really.

[Full Court]

. And frankly, if the evidence of the physical creation contradicts Genesis, I'll believe the physical creation.

Your rejection of God is between you and Him.

[lemura]

I believe in God's word - Odin's that is. Why do you believe your fairy tale is any more valid than mine?

[Free Baptist]

Simple, you have just believed bogus evidence brought forward by people who want the world without its Creator.

[eleni121]

I've posted more than enough as to why evo is washed up...just like those who are fascinated by its charms.

[Senator Bedfellow]

I believe I owe you a friendly fire alert. Back up, revise, and extend :)

[balrog666]

When you wake up in the morning, think marketing 101: there is a ready audience of Cleti who are waiting for a breathless expose' of how the TOE is one big hoax. You could write that book and join Hovid at the beach, laughing all the way to the bank.

No, he couldn't. He has some self-respect.

[MRMEAN]

In your post 159 you stated:

Some texts which don’t use Haeckel’s forged drawings, still use his discredited theory. One of those is the current (1998) National Association of Science teacher’s guide, “Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science”. "

In my post 350 I provided you with an on-line link to that document, and asked you to show where it uses "his discredited theory." You have yet to do so. Please either provide the text (and link) backing up your claim, or withdraw it.

[Baraonda]

"If that is how many believe evolution, then they are following satan."

It's called making a pact with the horny one. And they, evolutionists, have.

"If that is how many believe evolution, then they are following satan."

There is a huge spiritual void in them that a Mack truck has no problems going through. They try to fill the void with psychobabble evolution theory, but it's all in vain, the void and the accompanying fear remains.

"Some day soon ... you're in for a nasty surprise - eternity where the sun doesn't shine."

Caron (the demon)is waiting for them to transport these unhappy souls to the other side of the Acheron (a river) to experience in darkness the pains of hell.

[Free Baptist]

"I believe in God's word - Odin's that is. Why do you believe your fairy tale is any more valid than mine?"

You are confessing that your belief system is a fairy tale?

[montag813]

Kent Hovind, a former high school science teacher turned creation science evangelist, said that evolution is the "dumbest and most dangerous theory on planet Earth"

Wow! A High School science teacher! Well I guess all the Yale PhD's are no match for this genius.

[Junior]

The fact of the matter is he could, anytime he wants, show up on FR...

Oh, Hovind's here. Hell, he's probably on this thread.

[furball4paws]

"Great Moments in Evolution" by Gary Larson.

Anybody got this one. I haven't been able to find it yet.

[Full Court]

I am not a Catholic...but I am willing to bet, that the Pope, has a much greater knowledge of the Bible, than you do(true, I dont know you or your background, but I do know that the Pope has studied the Bible in great remarkable detail, and no doubt has access to great Biblical scholars, as well as access of great scientific minds)... >

Here is the difference. I believe the Bible. I believe God's Word to be true.

These were more noble than those in Thessalonica,
in that they received the word with all readiness of mind,
and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. Acts 17:11

The Pope and the Catholic Church can not make the same claim.

Read it and weep, and if you have a problem with the pope and the catholic church rejecting the Bible please take it up with them.

Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent

THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-1811332,00.html

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Dude, you've been on this thread all day - take a break."

I did, I was out for over 5 hours.

"When you wake up in the morning, think marketing 101: there is a ready audience of Cleti who are waiting for a breathless expose' of how the TOE is one big hoax. You could write that book and join Hovid at the beach, laughing all the way to the bank."

Unlike Hovind, I have integrity.

[Coyoteman]

No need to review ... "religious folk" clearly know where the hate lies. More to the point is that the monopoly that evolution holds over academia warps the research that should be going on. Evo theory has cornered the market so to speak on new ways of looking at life on earth. Further, the gaps, illogical leaps, outright lies in the field of evolution has undermined what real science - a science not cahined to secularism - could be doing. Evos have decided that undermining Christian origin beliefs is their primary mission. Very sad that science has deteriorated to this low point.

Please look back on this thread and see where the hate actually lies. It is quite clear. That is why post #70, for example, was removed by the moderators. (References to its content are in some following posts.) I have yet to see the kind of hate directed at "evilutionists" from our side. Scorn, derision, and outright laughter--yes, but not hate. And there is a difference.

As far as your comment that "Evos have decided that undermining Christian origin beliefs is their primary mission"--this is false.

I have mentioned on these threads that I spent half of my graduate school time and half of my Ph.D. study on fossil man/human osteology, and never once did creation science come up (ID had not been invented at the time). There was simply no mention of "undermining Christian origin beliefs." Science does science, and (hopefully) religion does religion.

I don't know where you are getting your information about "evos" but I can tell you from my experience that a lot of it is simply wrong.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" Your rejection of God is between you and Him."

Your rejection of the physical evidence is your own business.

[furball4paws]

Didn't answer my #559 either. So, I guess there's no answer.

[lemura]

Self-respect is for losers; you wouldn't see a Rockfeller (John D, not his wimpy decendents) behaving in such a fashion. They would seize a market opportunity and exploit for all its worth. There are millions of Cleti out there just waiting to help you retire early. (Or finance the next chair at MIT.)

[montag813]

inviting them to debate Hovind for an honorarium of $200 to be provided to the individual or group of individuals who agreed. Before the event began, the “No-Debater List,” which was comprised of slides listing the names of UWM science professors who declined the invitation, was projected behind the stage.

Sounds like a friggin Nazi tactic. How despicable. There is no conlict between Creation and Evolution. You can easily believe in both, as do I. Drooling idiots like this boob do nothing but support the most negative stereotypes of Christians, like those morons who lie their way through natural history museums to the poor children who don't know any better and--because of their false teachers--never will.