Replies

What have I lied about?

I didn't actually call you a liar. I've seen a number of clearly false statements from you, but thus far I've seen no clear evidence that you actually know them to be false.

What have I misrepresented?

I don't call creationists liars simply for professing creationism, and I know no one else who does. I call creationists liars when they lie. And when I say "lie", I mean make statements that are false even to someone who does not accept evolution. For example, Kent Hovind has claimed that two samples taken from one wooly mammoth specimen produced two different dates. In reality, the samples were taken from two different specimens. Kent Hovind is lying. In the case that triggered this discussion, nmh made a demonstratably false claim about philosopher Antony Flew (demonstratably false as in it was in direct contradiction to the statement of the article, and nmh repeated the false claim even when the relevant part of the article was quoted) and then later nmh denied saying anything at all about Antony Flew, even though nmh's previous posting on the matter was directly linked.

I showed you what was said and you say I am misrepresenting something?

Yes. You are misrepresenting the reason that creationists are called liars.

If I cut to the chase and you don't like it - don't twist it to I'm misrepresenting anything.

It has nothing to do with whether or not I like it. It has to do with the fact that your representation of why creationists are called liars does not reflect reality.

Basically once she tells you something is so, anytime after that you say anything different, now you are a liar.

Well that is just once piece of the demented 10,000 fragment liar kaleidoscope. It is almost impossible to not be a liar in the demented world unless you worship at the altar of darwinistic evolutionism, its main deity the flying spaghetti monster.

Wolf

You know what, with all you babbling, you say nothing.

It stands. You are calling God a liar. God created the world and every living thing in it. If you do not accept His Word, The Bible, you have no capacity for truth.

Yet you hang onto what Kent says. A mere man who depends on God for his every breath. Why do you look up to man? How lowly do you think of yourself? Animals do that - oh I forgot - you belief humans are animals. But then again, I guess Kent's (monkey brain) is an animal too.

Remember, at one time, 'man" said the world was flat. However, those who seek truth knew better - the bible explains it - and doesn't explain it as flat.

So, keep believing man - they are always finding something new and denouncing what they said yesterday.

But God always was, always will be, and will always remain the same. TRUTH DOESN'T CHANGE. On that note - no more chit-chat. I'm not into talking to animals but I do wish you all the best and may you have enough pee-pee pads for all you needs.

I didn't actually call you a liar. I've seen a number of clearly false statements from you, but thus far I've seen no clear evidence that you actually know them to be false.

Dimensio, you are a kinder soul than I.

When you nail a CRIDer and they don't have a proper response (so far they are batting zero % against yours, my and other Evo posts), they retreat immediately into logical fallacies. Setting up a strawman argument on purpose is deception, which is a form of lying.

Screen, your posts seem to come to "You must believe the Bible." You have been upbraided many times as this being a logical fallacy, yet you repeat it. After the first time, the repitition becomes a lie.