|
Creationism is a religious doctrine.
That's a pretty stout limb you wandered onto :). Your other points are spot on as well.
If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?
Thanks for the ping!
I completely agree with your summations. Before the Dover decision, I believed that ID was "IT", according to the Discovery Institute, and ID was pretty much becoming the prevailing theory among scientists. After Dover, I first felt that the defendants' attorneys had done a bad job and I looked into what they had done wrong. So I've studied the issue in detail since (NOT on the specific scientific issues) .It turns out, it wasn't the attorneys, it was the Discovery Institute and ID!!! And, OMG, the misleading legal statements from the ID'ers afterward!!! If the DI's science is as good as their legal positions, they must not be allowed in schools!!!