[tomzz]

Please explain how attacking one data point somehow undermines TToE. This is analogous to saying since Saint Christopher didn't exist, Christianity is a sham.

I'm not 'attacking one data point'; I'm claiming that in this particular case, evolutionists have been caught in an outright act of fraud and it is both clear and instructive that in their own minds they have done nothing wrong. They are so totally bought into a basic paradigm that they view any piece of evidence which contradicts that paradigm to be damaged and in need of some sort of repair or restoration.

By contrast, even the nazis and communists knew better than to buy into their own idiotic propaganda on a wholesale basis.

[SaveUS]

"By contrast, even the nazis and communists knew better than to buy into their own idiotic propaganda on a wholesale basis."

Tom, you are the author of "Tyrannosaur Meat". Goob

[freedumb2003]

I'm not 'attacking one data point'; I'm claiming that in this particular case, evolutionists have been caught in an outright act of fraud and it is both clear and instructive that in their own minds they have done nothing wrong. They are so totally bought into a basic paradigm that they view any piece of evidence which contradicts that paradigm to be damaged and in need of some sort of repair or restoration.

You mis-state both the situation at hand and the use that mis-statement to paint with a broad brush.

"Fraud" (which I do not concede) in a single case is attacking a single data point.

By contrast, even the nazis and communists knew better than to buy into their own idiotic propaganda on a wholesale basis.

Goodwin's Law.