Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

The Anti Crusade Against The Elderly

(excerpt) The powerful and wealthy Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [RWJF], which receives virtually all its billions from stock ownership in pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson, has been a big player and a major source of funding for anti-smoker programs and grants ever since Johnson & Johnson began to market nicotine replacement products. Basically, RWJF funds any study or program that will raise the price of cigarettes and promote the use of "cessation" products (such as J&J's Nicotrol). The foundation is also big on promoting smoking bans, no doubt in the hope that more smokers will try to quit smoking and purchase "nicotine replacement" products.

Not content with attempting to ban smoking in the workplace, in restaurants and bars, and on virtually all modes of public transportation, the anti-tobacco/pharmacological cartel is now campaigning to ban smoking in facilities for the elderly.

1 posted on 09/26/2006 12:45:54 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ...

2 posted on 09/26/2006 12:46:27 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
well, of all places to ban smoking, nursing homes would be right at the top of the list......

people are not well in nursing homes....they don't need smoke filtering around ....

plus, people WORK in nursing homes...unless you are prepared to pay untold millions and millions to workers required to be around smoke...

of course, you will say..." they can just get another job"...well, SOMEBODY has got to work in nursing homes.....its labor intensive you know.....

3 posted on 09/26/2006 12:55:32 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

One would think that federal regulations would trump county regulations. If the nursing home loses Medicaid and Medicare funding, it'll be a fairly empty nursing home.


4 posted on 09/26/2006 1:05:40 AM PDT by Outland (Socialism IS the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

This is what ya get when ya demand that the gummint micromanage every aspect of everybody's daily life:

"Everything that's not forbidden is required" translates to "Dam#ed if you do, and dam#ed if you don't"

The most dangerous phrase in the English language is still: "There oughtta be a law"...


5 posted on 09/26/2006 2:06:41 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Stop the "tyranny of the 'offended' " -- say what you mean and stand by it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Wait until some geezer on oxygen set the place on fire with his cigarette and toasts 10 or 15 other geezers and you'll find out which law the nursing home management should have been following.

Disaster awaits, stay tuned.

6 posted on 09/26/2006 2:13:35 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

It is dangerous to allow smoking. This should be a safety issue.


7 posted on 09/26/2006 2:54:54 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
"How many people are in these nursing homes because of a smoking habit?" Crouch asked.

It doesn't matter. The nursing home is now their home, and they're at an age, and state of health, where quiting a life long habit isn't going to do any good. Also, these people have little else to do, so allow them to do what makes them happy, for what little time they have left.

45 posted on 09/26/2006 7:19:36 AM PDT by AFreeBird (If American "cowboy diplomacy" did not exist, it would be necessary to invent it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
If a nursing home bans smoking, they could lose federal funding for failing to comply with regulations, but if they allow smoking they could face fines or a lawsuit from the county health department, officials said.

And thus begins the backlash of the nanny state.
100 posted on 09/26/2006 3:35:12 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

Hi SheLion!

Thanks to you I've been syo'ing for almost a year now. No taxes to federal, state or city governments.


150 posted on 09/27/2006 2:07:16 PM PDT by stultorum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

Not too surprising that the cost of using the gum is roughly equivalent to that of smoking. If they really wanted people to quit they'd sell it cheap.


160 posted on 09/27/2006 4:42:40 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Political Correctness is communist propaganda writ small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion

There was a similar rule about alcohol in my great aunts nursing home. She started each day with a shot of blackberry brandy for years.

My Dad and uncle would take turns smuggling it in.


187 posted on 09/28/2006 1:49:30 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson