Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Groups mixed on Mary Cheney's pregnancy
Yahoo ^ | December 6, 2006 | Yahoo/AP

Posted on 12/06/2006 8:50:01 PM PST by freedomdefender

Conservative leaders voiced dismay Wednesday at news that Mary Cheney, the lesbian daughter of Dick Cheney, is pregnant, while a gay-rights group said the vice president faces "a lifetime of sleepless nights" for serving in an administration that has opposed recognition of same-sex couples.

Mary Cheney, 37, and her partner of 15 years, Heather Poe, 45, are expecting a baby in late spring, said Lea Anne McBride, a spokeswoman for the vice president.

"The vice president and Mrs. Cheney are looking forward with eager anticipation" to the arrival of their sixth grandchild, McBride said.

Mary Cheney was an aide to her father during the 2004 campaign, and now is vice president for consumer advocacy at AOL. She and Poe moved from Colorado to Virginia a year ago to be closer to the Cheney family.

Family Pride, which advocates on behalf of gay and lesbian families, noted that Virginia last month became one of 27 states with a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

"Unless they move to a handful of less restrictive states, Heather will never be able to have a legal relationship with her child," said Family Pride executive director Jennifer Chrisler.

The couple "will quickly face the reality that no matter how loved their child will be. ... he or she will never have the same protections that other children born to heterosexual couples enjoy," Chrisler said. "Grandfather Cheney will no doubt face a lifetime of sleepless nights as he reflects on the irreparable harm he and his administration have done to the millions of American gay and lesbian parents and their children."

For years, Mary Cheney's openness about her sexual orientation had posed a dilemma for conservative activists who admire Dick Cheney's stance on many issues but consider homosexuality a sin.

Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America described the pregnancy as "unconscionable."

"It's very disappointing that a celebrity couple like this would deliberately bring into the world a child that will never have a father," said Crouse, a senior fellow at the group's think tank. "They are encouraging people who don't have the advantages they have."

Crouse said there was no doubt that the news would, in conservatives' eyes, be damaging to the Bush administration, which already has been chided by some leaders on the right for what they felt was halfhearted commitment to anti-abortion and anti-gay-rights causes in this year's general election.

Carrie Gordon Earll, a policy analyst for the conservative Christian ministry Focus on the Family, expressed empathy for the Cheney family but depicted the newly announced pregnancy as unwise.

"Just because you can conceive a child outside a one-woman, one-man marriage doesn't mean it's a good idea," said. "Love can't replace a mother and a father."

The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances of Mary Cheney's pregnancy.

The news was welcomed by the president of the largest national gay-rights group, Joe Solmonese of the Human Rights Campaign.

"Mary and Heather's decision to have a child is an example that families in America come in all different shapes and sizes," he said. "The bottom line is that a family is made up of love and commitment."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fatherlesschild; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2006 8:50:03 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Well isn't that special. Is the father handing out cigars? Oh wait, there isn't a father - or, there is, but I guess he donated through a test tube.


2 posted on 12/06/2006 8:52:13 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

"Crouse said there was no doubt that the news would, in conservatives' eyes, be damaging to the Bush administration, "

And that would be absolutely ridiculous. How exactly does the Bush administration have any control over her?


3 posted on 12/06/2006 8:53:10 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

The news was welcomed by the president of the largest national gay-rights group, Joe Solmonese of the Human Rights Campaign.
-------
No surprise -- as a father of two, I think it is SELFISH for gays to get pregnant without a father to help raise the child -- it is quite selfish, in fact.


4 posted on 12/06/2006 8:53:23 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
This vile news story will be kept around for the next 9 months and beyond and will cause the GOP to hemorrhage even more social conservative voters. Too bad we have nowhere else to go...yet.
5 posted on 12/06/2006 8:54:08 PM PST by Antoninus (Rudy as nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media love him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Crouse said there was no doubt that the news would, in conservatives' eyes, be damaging to the Bush administration, which already has been chided by some leaders on the right for what they felt was halfhearted commitment to anti-abortion and anti-gay-rights causes in this year's general election.

I don't get the righteous indignation directed toward Bush from some quarters over this. WTF is Bush supposed to do about it, yell at her? And what are the Cheneys supposed to do, quit loving their daughter? I'm quite certain the kid will turn out just fine with Dick and Lynn as grandparents.

6 posted on 12/06/2006 8:54:37 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
You can't blame Cheney for his daughter, any more than you can blame Reagan for dancing Ronnie Jr.

But that doesn't mean that Mary herself can't be criticized.

7 posted on 12/06/2006 8:56:01 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan
And that would be absolutely ridiculous. How exactly does the Bush administration have any control over her?

It's all about news media spin, brother. This kind of cr@p is a disaster for the GOP among social conservatives.

IMO, this story will end up doing more damage to the GOP than the Mark Foley scandal ever did.
8 posted on 12/06/2006 8:56:43 PM PST by Antoninus (Rudy as nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media love him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Just because ones child does something outrageous and irresponsible, not to mention selfish, does that mean a parent (and a high elected official) is supposed to fully support the decision, champion it and celebrate it from the highest rooftops ? Give me a break.


9 posted on 12/06/2006 8:57:03 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

she is free to make whatever choices she wants, that's a separate issue from what society as a whole must be willing to codify into law regarding her personal choices. she should not be demonized or criticized in any way, that simply marginalizes conservatives as being the "judgemental religious right" crowd.

I wish her well, in a age where so many women abort their babies - she at least wants to give birth to one.


10 posted on 12/06/2006 8:57:10 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

You can't stop people from having babies because they're lesbians...you do know that, don't you? And you do know that straight people have artificial insemination too, don't you?


11 posted on 12/06/2006 8:58:52 PM PST by Hildy ("Death plucks my ear and says - LIVE - I am coming.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Is the father handing out cigars?

No, that's David Crosby and his turkey-baster.
12 posted on 12/06/2006 8:59:04 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

that's because the "social conservatives" are too judgemental. what do they want Dick Cheney do to, abort the baby?

just leave her alone - her decision to have a baby has nothing to do with whether gay marriage needs to be codified into law by the rest of us.


13 posted on 12/06/2006 8:59:16 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

I wish her well, in a age where so many women abort their babies - she at least wants to give birth to one





I suspect it was a planned pregnancy.


14 posted on 12/06/2006 8:59:24 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

I'm with you there. I don't think same-sex couples should be able to adopt, and fertility clinics shouldn't be AE-ing them either, as appears to be the case here. But I don't understand the hand-wringing directed at W or the Cheneys. There's plenty of legitimate reasons to be angry with Bush, and this ain't one of 'em.


15 posted on 12/06/2006 9:00:06 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Mary Cheney, the lesbian daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney. The same Dick Cheney who was also a Halliburton former chief executive! lol
16 posted on 12/06/2006 9:00:13 PM PST by endthematrix ("If it's not the Crusades, it's the cartoons.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Reagan Jr. makes you wish Nancy had a headache the night they conceived. Michael is the only real son of Ronnie, Sr., heart and soul, even if he isn't blood.


17 posted on 12/06/2006 9:00:21 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
she should not be demonized or criticized in any way

No? Not for willfully depriving her child of any knowledge of the man who sired him/her? What does a lesbo-mom tell her little kid when he asks--and eventually all of them will--who his Daddy was, anyway? Do they lie?

I seriously want to know what the answer to that question is.
18 posted on 12/06/2006 9:00:56 PM PST by Antoninus (Rudy as nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media love him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: durasell

indeed. whatever it is, its her choice.


19 posted on 12/06/2006 9:01:17 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

"Mary Cheney, 37, and her partner of 15 years, Heather Poe, 45, are expecting a baby in late spring,"

""Mary and Heather's decision to have a child"


I failed Biology (among many other courses), does this mean Cheney carries/uses the other's embryo?


Other then that..this isn't a big deal...I put it in the "Who Cares" category....


20 posted on 12/06/2006 9:02:51 PM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson