Posted on 01/30/2007 4:43:23 PM PST by T.L.Sink
Personally, I prefer Tancredo although I admire "America's Mayor," and this article sheds some light on Rudy's little known conservative and courageous accomplishments.
Thank you for the head's up.
Apparently you will exploit any display of good will to make a point. Which is precisely why I don't wish you to post to me any longer. I won't make such a mistake again.
It is against forum rules to CONTINUALLY post the same crap on thread after thread.
I am not the one who brought the Admin Moderator into the argument. I copied them because they were on the post I replied to. If anyone is crying, it is the liberal hijackers on this conservative website.
Posting factual refutations of the lies spouted by those claiming Rudy is a conservative is NOT spam. They are FACTS.
No, the history of the GOP over the past 30 years makes it clear: social liberals lose (think Gerald Ford); social conservatives win (think Ronald Reagan).
STFU, Tommy Dale.
In all likelihood, yes. Unless there is really something dark and dirty about the primary winner I can't stand, I'm going to vote for the GOP nominee. Now if Hunter ran a mudlslinging campaign against my candidate of choice, or something else to garner my personal ire I'd have to reconsider. Other than that, yep.
Uh, he's dead.
Don't you wish. Try not to wrap yourself in Reagan; he must be rolling over in his grave with what is going on on this web site with all these attacks on GOP candidates.
OTOH conservatives do NOT favor abortion on demand (especially not the barbaric partial-birth type), they rarely offer to pay for their daughter's abortion, they rarely support gun control and illegal immigration isn't popular with them either. Rudy is a LIBERAL babykiller.
My argument is not that we need a social liberal to win. No one else is making that argument.
The more sober individuals here are noting that none of Republican heavyweights this election are social conservatives. That's life. As Rumsfeld put it, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you would like to have in the future.
The benefit of Giuliani is that he will not only give us 80% of what we want, but he will completely wipe out the Dems and give us Congress back. Run someone like Tancredo, we may actually lose more seats in 2008. A strong national ticket also has the effect of emboldening conservatives at the state and local level. While a weak candidate like Hunter means Republicans will be more timid and more compromising with the Democrats, given Hillary or Osama Obama will be stomping him by 20 pts and they'll be afraid of losing their seats.
Goodlord! You two sound like my kids sitting in the back seat of the truck! Daddy! he touched me! Don't touch me! You touched me! WAAA WAAA WAAA! LOL
And yet you would surely label me a "100 percenter."
If you do say so yourself?
Please. We have had this discussion TOO! I never post to you and you ALWAYS post to me when I AGREE WITH YOU.
Try not to show yourself as such a prig.
Propagandist?
We've made factual posts. You don't like the facts.
Hey Narse...we are at war. What is your plan?
Frankly, I'm sick of the holier than thous on here.
I'm just proving a point.
I haven't and I wouldn't unless I was certain you fit that role.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.