My posts point to the ~fact~ that many rational eyewitnesses saw a streak of light prior to the incident, and that a tape of that streak was played on TV shortly after, then never seen again.
-- You're being 'aggressive' about that fact, - and I'm not passive.
You might as well post that the sky is not blue and stubbornly refuse to acknowledge than anyone can even argue that its blue. Everything you post appears to simply be an act, designed to continue getting responses, but without any real bearing on the thread at hand.
I'm addressing the issue at hand, while you are making personal comments about 'my act'.
This is not normal behavior. It is antisocial, and certainly harmful to FR.
Another bizarre personal comment, - by you.
For you to be allowed back after being banned so many times defies logic. I’ve never witnessed you adding anything but vitriol to a thread. A lot of posters now avoid you, like they avoid a drunk on a park bench, but I refuse to be annoyed off of a thread by the likes of you.
I've been arguing the issue. You're adding the "vitriol", - as anyone can see.
You've provided no material evidence of this claim. Nor have you provided any documentation of what the witnessing claim to have seen. "A streak of light" is very vague.
I'm addressing the issue at hand,
Hardly. You refuse to address the issue.
What kind of missile was it?
If not a missile, what could it have been?
How can the time frame of the "streak" correlate to being causal to the accident?
These are but a few of the things you refuse to address.
Another bizarre personal comment, - by you.
Your behavior is what it is, antisocial.
I've been arguing the issue.
You've done nothing of the sort. You've said there was a streak. By and large, no one has argued with that. Beyond that you have implied much and argued nothing. You've yet to materially challenge any post by anyone concerning the issue of a missile. Nor have you argued your case that the streak was causal to the explosion. Not once.
All you've done is duck, run and demagogue.