Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V-shaped UFOs in NM photos
examiner ^ | January 16 2009

Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono

CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: archive; bestphotos; callingartbell; chama; et; itsafreakinbird; jm; jpb; kookfringe; kooks; newmexico; nm; roswell; sightings; superstition; tinfoilhat; ufo; ufoarchive; ukmod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,341-1,351 next last
To: JoJo Gunn

I have been pondering . . . occasionally . . . your case, however . . .

The odds are . . . you know someone in the know . . . or you know someone who knows someone in the know.

Either they have

NOT

1. commented authoritatively within range . . .

or

2. you have not believed them . . .

or

3. they have lied to you or your closer connection . . .

or

4. they told you the truth and you believe them but you are on the payroll as a disinfo agent

or

. . .

. . .

Regardless . . . your pontifications, rants and rock throwing are real put-offs of little continuing interest.


61 posted on 01/17/2009 4:53:55 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DevNet

At some point, regardless of the megapixel design of the camera . . . an image blown up sufficiently will show pixelation.

I don’t understand how you could be so confident of such an assertion . . . sounds idiotic to this layman.


62 posted on 01/17/2009 4:55:18 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Stop with the capital letters and the double spacing and the shadow government stuff and answer the man’s question - why in all these years, with the proliferation of cameras available to almost anyone regardless of their social strata, are there yet no sharp images of a flying saucer?


63 posted on 01/17/2009 4:56:08 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK

I guess you never read the report about the government high ranking something or other who was so disgusted with Billdo Klintoon’s brick of what—heroine or cocaine and such goings on that he protested strongly and resigned his position at those levels.


64 posted on 01/17/2009 4:56:56 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Quix
In that it winds a lot and is beautiful or what?

uhh...YES! ;-)

Nice big sweepers and a summit just over 10,000ft.

The Cumbres & Toltec runs through the same area.

I've just emailed the article to a riding friend who lives in Chama to see what his take on all this is.

65 posted on 01/17/2009 4:57:49 PM PST by uglybiker (1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

That question has probably been answered hereon probably 2 dozen times.

If you think I’m going to answer you yet again . . .

you are more . . . out of it than I ever imagined.


66 posted on 01/17/2009 4:58:16 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Quix
sounds idiotic to this layman

It's certainly all uphill from here on. 

67 posted on 01/17/2009 4:59:16 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

Thanks.

Would love to read his response.

I haven’t ridden that railroad yet.

NOt sure I want that close that remotely to those areas! LOL.


68 posted on 01/17/2009 4:59:28 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

IF

you think I’ve hired you as my formatting coach

you REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYYYY

ought to see someone at a high rate per hour.


69 posted on 01/17/2009 5:00:28 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Because I downloaded multiple pictures from that camera and zoomed in on various regions of them.

Every single picture shows much greater detail - the picture show doesn’t look like it was taken from a $5000 camera - it shows artifacts and errors that the sensor in an expensive camera simply would not show.

Don’t get me wrong - I would love for such a picture to be real - but I don’t think this one is.


70 posted on 01/17/2009 5:01:53 PM PST by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DevNet

Sounds convincing.

Did you zoom in to the point of pixelation???


71 posted on 01/17/2009 5:03:44 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Quix
That question has probably been answered hereon probably 2 dozen times.

If you think I’m going to answer you yet again . . .

you are more . . . out of it than I ever imagined.

This isn't about me. It's about the man who asked the question, and by extension everyone else on this planet who asks the same question.

You've publicly pronounced them as "ignorant", so give them your bona fides.

72 posted on 01/17/2009 5:07:20 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DevNet
Devnet, it's futile, unless you can get the actual original, and actual originals never seem to appear when it comes to claims of flying saucers. 

This is the first image taken by the Albuquerque woman - no cropping - sized down for this web page.

73 posted on 01/17/2009 5:12:09 PM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DevNet; Las Vegas Dave; doug from upland; SunkenCiv

Ike’s comments regarding TPTB:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdrGKwkmxAU

REAGAN one of several times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag44dRO8LEA

REAGAN again a different time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KvC_NDlHoI

JOHN PODESTA IN THE KLINTOON ADMIN . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2Sz-MgoFos

which is one reason . . . the fellow on C2C a week or 3 ago was contending that OThuga will herald the springing of the whole thing wholesale on the public and the planet.


74 posted on 01/17/2009 5:12:30 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: kempo

You said — “There have been millions of digital cameras sold over the years where all you have to do is point and push a button and perfect picture. Not one clear picture of a UFO. Amazing.”

It’s not as easy as you think, getting pictures of things in the air. I have tried taking pictures of planes and blimps in the sky, with a good Canon digital camera and what you see with your eyes (and it looks like the camera should pick it up okay), it just doesn’t seem as big or as clear in the digital picture as with your own eyes.

I’ve taken pictures of blimps, which are slow moving and a couple of miles away, and they don’t turn out to be that good.

Another problem with snapping these pictures (even ordinary planes and blimps), if you’ve got your camera in the car or in the house — you run to get it and by the time you’re back (even in less than 1/2 a minute) the thing is gone or behind a tree or cloud or whatever.

But, besides all that — there have been pictures posted on the web and other UFO websites that do show pictures that are taken. They look as blurry and as indistinct as the picture I try to take of *simple* and *ordinary* objects in the sky... LOL...

Another problem with the zoom that some people have on their cameras, is that it’s not an optical zoom but rather a digital zoom and it just blurs the picture more. And in addition to that, when you put on a larger zoom on your camera, besides you getting a blurry picture just from the zoom (on the digital part), you get a blurry picture because it’s harder to hold the camera still when shooting it when on zoom. Furthermore, if the f-stop is not right (depending on your settings on the camera, or the focus isn’t fast enough or right, then you’ll get blurry pictures, too.

There’s a lot going on with those cameras to make things blurry in the sky. It’s not like taking pictures of an outdoor BBQ in your backyard... :-)


75 posted on 01/17/2009 5:15:29 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DevNet; Las Vegas Dave

BUZ ALDRIN:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY0K240Hquw

GORDON COOPER:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVL3I2Yv9FA

ED MITCHELL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVMeqblBgiA

SOVIET COSMONAUT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3Rbap8Zm3Y


76 posted on 01/17/2009 5:20:24 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

It’s conceivable that

Ginkgo Biloba

just MIGHT help that horrific memory problem.


77 posted on 01/17/2009 5:23:41 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

You said — “Well, I for one would love to be Enlightened.”

I posted to the other guy that asked the question. You can see it at #75...


78 posted on 01/17/2009 5:23:57 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

And that leaves out entirely such things as laminar etc. exotic ionized air flows over the craft’s skin distorting images etc.


79 posted on 01/17/2009 5:25:36 PM PST by Quix (LEADRs SAY FRM 1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I guess you and I have different interperetations of 'remote'!

The next town north of Chama is Antonito, Co. The whole trip takes about an hour and a half.

If you head East, it's only 75 miles to Taos.

80 posted on 01/17/2009 5:31:11 PM PST by uglybiker (1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,341-1,351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson