Judge questions Orly Taitz claims to have Obama birth certificate in hearing ...

Ledger Enquirer ^ | Sept. 14, 2009 | CHUCK WILLIAMS

[Non-Sequitur]

You can admit it that you’re an Obot defending socialism.

Why would I want to lie?

[LucyT]

The case is to determine if Obama can legitimately hold presidential office under the US Constitution Natural Born Citizen clause. If Obama is not a legitimate US President, than he cannot be the Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, and therefore cannot lawfully give orders for the military to follow.

[Non-Sequitur]

You seem to agree then, that the deployment order didn't come from 0bama and therefore, his qualifications are irrelevant in ths particular situation.

I do, but in the end what you and I believe is irrelevant. It's what the judge believes, and he doesn't seem impressed with Orly's arguments.

[AZ .44 MAG]

Thanks for the ping, Lucy.

[rolling_stone]

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/

[SpaceBar]

My big problem with this whole thing, and the judge’s statements in particular is that for every job, license, identification, security check, or proof of eligibility for various professional capacities we have in our country, the only one that seems to have shifted burden of proof on the investigators and not the investigated is the office of President as it pertains specifically to one Barack Hussein Obama. They changed the rules just for him.

[Non-Sequitur]

Then will she have standing?

Doubtful. None of the plaintiffs in earlier cases have.

[Krodg]

You seem to love seeing obama getting away with thumbing his noes at the Constitution.

[LucyT]

.

.... to #58.

[Non-Sequitur]

You seem to love seeing obama getting away with thumbing his noes at the Constitution.

No, I love seeing the law upheld.

[RVN Airplane Driver]

Would you be a lawyer by chance?

[Non-Sequitur]

Would you be a lawyer by chance?

No, but I know quite a few people who are.

[pissant]

And which law, chinslurp, did Obama follow when he proved himself legitimately qualified for CIC?

[Vendome]

NS:
I don't enjoy your cold glass of water or that other fellow that showed up the other day, ‘cept that you are correct.

I have wondered about discovery and burden for while and I cannot think of any way to compel Barry O. for proof.

Would attacking the COLB as a fraud give cause?

I forgot the fellow and he seemed interesting, if you recall can you include him in this discussion?

[Red Steel]

Irrelevant. Everyone else in her chain of command can.

Not like your posts are - irrelevant.

I repeat again for you from my post at #39:

"The Afghanistan or the Iraq deployment order came from the Secretary of Defense who works in the Executive Branch of government. The SECDEF works for Obama at his pleasure. It’s the same as if Obama gave her the order."

This particular order, deployment order, to go to war does comes from Obama himself.

For your edification. Here is what her chain of command in descending order possibly looks like... it comes close:

Obama
SECDEF
CINC USCENTCOM
USFOR-A
Corp Commander
Division Commander
Brigade Commander
Battalion Commander
Unit Commander
Immediate supervisor

[Red Steel]

Why would I want to lie?

But in your case, it would be the truth - you defend Obama with obfuscation and anything else that you can get away with.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

Bump Dat...

[Quix]

Thanks.

[stockpirate]

You are not funny.

[Bigh4u2]

Hasn’t precedent already been set by the Army(?not sure which branch it was) already rescinding another soldiers orders based on the same complaint?