Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

RIGHT ON!

Nice job!
You did it!!!!!!!!!

On my Long form BC it has two boxes (box 11b “Date received by local Registrar” and box 11c “Date Accepted by the state”), on mine they both have a hand stamp (meaning a stamp held in someone’s hand where dials are turned to give the correct date, yes old school style) both of which read Aug 14 1969.

My birthday is Aug. 7th 1969. in box 10a there is the “Certifier signature”, the Dr. who delivered me, Dr. Moncur MD in this case. He certified my live birth on Aug 13th 1969, which is hand written out with the same pen that the Dr. signed his name (box 10a) with in box 10b (the date).

On my computer printed COLB it states:” DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR August 14, 1969”

I was born in Honolulu Hawaii, and so the “date received by local registrar”, “date accepted by the state” and “date filed by the registrar” are all the same date, Aug 14 1969. My Certificate was signed by the Dr the day before (Aug 13 1969), sent to the Honolulu office the next day (Aug 14 1969).

This story adds up perfectly.

Upon calling the DOH and asking what the difference between “filed by” and “accepted” on meant, I was told that they meant the same thing. The same story they gave Misstickley. Which is a true story, they just left out the fact that on the outer islands the date that a record is accepted by the state and the day it gets an actual FILE number in Honolulu could easily have been different.

She has done it, the Posted COLB on FactCheck etc is with certainty a forgery.


39 posted on 02/23/2010 9:55:40 AM PST by Danae (Don't like our Constitution? Try living in a country with out one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Danae

Have you ever seen your birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers?

I thought I heard you say earlier that you were not born at Kapiolani. Is that correct?


52 posted on 02/23/2010 10:29:46 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Danae; butterdezillion
I was born in Honolulu Hawaii, and so the “date received by local registrar”, “date accepted by the state” and “date filed by the registrar” are all the same date,

Thanks for that info. I was hesitant the other day to give a definite answer on the dates because each state has a different form. I'm looking at one from a different state but of the same time period and it only has the date received locally and the number. It doesn't have a file date. Good to know Hawaii has those separate boxes. Looks like a slam dunk!

172 posted on 02/23/2010 1:26:05 PM PST by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

Just for the record. Following are two “Certificate of Live Birth” ‘s from Hawaii in my possession
________________________________

My birth date is Sept. 14, 1968...born in Honolulu Hawaii at Tripler Army Medical Center at 9:33pm.

Dr. signed (block 10a) the form.
(block 10b) Date Signed: September 16, 1968

Date Received by Local Registrar: (block 11b) September 16, 1968

Date Accepted By State: (block 11c) Sep 20 1968
_______________________________________________

My son born Dec. 29, 1988 in Honolulu at Tripler AMC

Date signed by DR.: January 3, 1989

Date Received by Local Registrar: Jan - 6 1989

Date Accepted By State: Jan - 6 1989


210 posted on 02/23/2010 2:16:41 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
"Upon calling the DOH and asking what the difference between “filed by” and “accepted” on meant, I was told that they meant the same thing. The same story they gave Misstickley."

Well.. according to butterdezillion here you both got a wrong answer.

Or butter did.
214 posted on 02/23/2010 2:22:47 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Danae
" She has done it, the Posted COLB on FactCheck etc is with certainty a forgery. "

Apart from other " EVIDENCE " ... this is well proven, and it is intrinsic " EVIDENCE " that can and will hold up in a court of law.
423 posted on 02/24/2010 1:56:22 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson