Anyone still glomming onto this topic should invest in tinfoil hats.
Anyone thinking that the BC is fake because letters don’t align has never used an old, manual typewriter. They don’t know that capital letters are created by actually shift the entire typing plane UP. Depending on how fast you type, or how hard you press down on the shift, letters can easily become misaligned vertically. I have owned and used an old typewriter of this sort and can attest to this. So, your post just demonstrates that you don’t understand old typewriters, not that the birth certificate is fake.
Next, those that are attaching themselves to “layers” issue are also demonstrating ignorance... but on a different subject. It is clear to me at this point that the layers were simply created as part of the scanning process as part of a built-in OCR (optical character recognition) cycle. You can easily see that the layers have been created for all text that has been scanned as the same color (evidenced by the antialiasing and contrast). This is a completely reasonable explanation of why there are layers. It is not the result of manipulation, but simply the result of the scanning program doing it’s thing.
It’s time to drop this subject. You can reasonable attack Obama for acting like a jackass and whimsically withholding this document for so long, allowing the country to be needlessly torn apart on the issue. That’s fair. You can attack Obama for destroying this country in other ways. But at this point, you cannot win this argument. Most reasonable conservatives - like myself - have examined the issue thoroughly and are satisfied. Now you are just looking like a fringe kook.
” Most reasonable conservatives - like myself - have examined the issue thoroughly and are satisfied. “
Have you examined the issue of his Conn. SS# ?
I’d like an explanation of that.
Remember, in a court of law, once they've demonstrated that you lied, everything else you say may be called into question on that basis alone.
What I suspect is that Hawaii's "short form option" was printed on a totally different system. My own office went through truly major printer changes every couple of years ~ and as aggressive as we were ~ far ahead of the crowd in fact ~ we were into two major data base systems having been replaced and we still had some operations still demanding tissue carbons!
GAD!
Of course that was back in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s ~ and time had a different flow then.
I've noticed that recently ALL systems are getting back to a common standard for operating commands. That's good. I would have liked that. This proves that it was an excellent idea to put DEC out of business. They're the guys who came up with the proprietary plugs and terminology.
Back to the issue ~ because Obama and his crowd generated the dispute with a string of falsehoods and bizarre responses to simple inquiries, nothing they do in this regard can ever be trusted.
I have been workign in digital imaging for over 20 years.
You are totally incorrect.
The EASY thing would have been to take a copy of his original BC to the copy machine and run off a couple for Obambi.
That is NOT what this is. This is a composit image, generated in photoshop. I can remove Obambi’s name and give you a PDF of anyone you like as being born there.
What he should have gotten was what you and I can get any time we want, without a team of lawyers having to sign ‘waivers’ - a plain old Xerox machine copy of the original.
Just like any one of us can get- except, it seems, for Obama.
That's clear to you? Then you know nothing about digital images or OCR.
I have been designing and writing computer software for digital imaging for over 20 years.
That statement you made is 100% wrong.
It would have been a simple task to take an original BC to the copy machine and run off a few. You and I can do that. Why does Obama find that so difficult.
Occams' razor applies here- he cannot run off copies of an original because it was not easier to do that, for some reason.
The constructed document your president presented for your consideration is not a copy of any documentation from the sixties, it is a fabrication which Hawaii has vouched for.
If you want to trust the proven liars in Hawaii and the commie scum soiling the oval office, that's fine, you're entitled to your sycophantic opinion. But don't try to shame others for not accepting the criminal behavior of your president and his criminal minions.
People like you watched sinkEmperor clinton shake his finger in your face and lie to you with anger, and you did as you were told, you sat down and shut up while he continued to destroy YOUR REPUBLIC. well, step aside, feckless, there are others who can chew gum and walk, and will beable to address more than one issue simultaneously.
Go back to being programmed by the CNN liars like John Klein and the MSNBC tinglers like Chrissy Matthews. But please, shut the hell up at Freerepublic when you feel the urge to expose your feckless mental state.
I was referring to the alignment of characters from line to line. Yes, you are correct, characters can be misaligned on a line of text. But I was talking about the above and below alignment. As you know, each character lines up with characters (if any) above and below it, like in a column. And, of course, that is because the roller rides on a straight gear with fixed spacing.