Posted on 04/29/2011 3:26:01 AM PDT by RGT
Your birth certificate may be a fake if, . . .
. . . unlike a real BC, the first word/number on each line don't line up correctly at the left margin.
Obama's BC is a forgery because these 5 words are not flush to the left margin. Male (box 2), Kapiolani (box 6c), BARACK (box 8), 25 (box 10), STANLEY (box 13), and 18 (box 15) should all be lined up, vertically, under the word Male. They would if typed on a real typewriter.
Your birth certificate may be a fake if, . . .
. . . unlike a real BC, your BC completely ignores tab stops. A standard practice typists in 1961. Very useful when filling out forms.
Obama's BC is a forgery because these 3 words are not in alignment. African (box 9), University (box 12b), and Caucasian (box 14) should all be alignment vertically as well. They would be if typed on a real typewriter using the TAB SET and Tab keys.
Your birth certificate may be a fake if, . . .
. . . unlike a real BC typed on a real typist, the person who typed your parents names took the time to center them.
Obama's BC is a forgery because the names are centered in the space provided. Typewritten names on real BC's tend to be crowded to the left. I don't know why that is but it is nonetheless true.
Compare Obama's BC with those of Susan Nordyke and Edith Coats.
The poster provided guidance in how you can do this for yourself.
Did anyone recall when we changed all of our paper money to defeat MODERN home printing machinery that could reproduce money that looked perfectly passable right down to the imbedded threads?
Oh, yes we did, and our money is being revised as we speak to defeat the latest and greatest stuff available over at Best Buy!
You missed my point. Hawaii could have given them a cg hard copy, but that’s not what we see.
He posted a link to a pdf.
When I sign for a mortgage, a notary uses his seal to make it all nice and legal.
Don’t they someone with a seal thingy at HDOH? This copy above all others should have the seal.
why did the bucket get only part of obama’s mothers signature?
the first part of her signature was forged and then used to sync it up with the rest of the document. it’s obvious.
Seals are really old fashioned. You'll see them disappear in your lifetime from everything but ceremonial documents.
That's always annoyed me when working around with some of the earlier Object Oriented software ~ the borders of the parts are too restrictive so you have to do a lot of guessing.
I still prefer to use this thing by Microsoft called FRONT PAGE. it allows you entirely too much latitude for everything (which means you have to remember what you did) but it allows you to open up OTHER STUFF to see what it's really about.
blah blah
You have something to say?
You're right.
Back in the Bronze Age, I worked as a secretary and typed up countless forms under exactly the scenario you present.
Rarely, if ever, was anything submitted for typing until all the information was available. What would be the point?
It's not only inefficient, it increases the probability of documents being lost. Picture this: a partially completed handwritten form is submitted to the typist. The partially completed typed form is then set aside and gets buried in a pile of similarly partially typed forms.
Now what? Does the typist go through the growing pile of forms each day to determine what's missing and then try to chase down that information? If this were standard operating procedure, it would be chaotic. The more the form is handled, the likelier the possibility of its being misplaced or lost.
It's an absurd scenario.
“Have you examined the issue of his Conn. SS# ?
I’d like an explanation of that.”
This is how it was explained on one website. Sounds like a reach to me.
The Connecticut issue
President Obama’s Social Security number (until it is changed because of its widespread publication) begins with the digits 042. While this is ordinarily an indication that the number was issued to someone living in Connecticut, the Social Security Administration says:
One should not make too much of the “geographical code.” It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.[1]
The first three digits of a Social Security number at that time were called the “Area Number”. And it is true that the Area Number 042 is normally issued for people who live in Connecticut (or apply for the Social Security card with a mailing address in Connecticut). President Obama lived in Hawaii in 1977, while attending Punahou School. He attended Punahou from the fifth grade until graduating in 1979, and his first job was at the Baskin Robbins at the corner of King and Punahou Streets in Honolulu.
So how did President Obama get a Social Security number with an Area Number reflecting residence (or mailing address) in Connecticut?
In light of the Social Security Administration’s disclaimer above, the most likely explanation is a clerical glitch. At the time, President Obama was only 15 years old, and lived with his grandparents in an address on Beretania Street in Honolulu. The President’s house in Hawaii was in zip code 96814. The zip code for Danbury, Connecticut is 06814. In 1977, clerical workers at the Social Security Administration were likely using typewriters, not computers, for their data entry tasks. Since the ‘0’ and ‘9’ on a typical typewriter are immediately adjacent, it would have been a common error to accidently type a ‘0’ when the ZIP code really began with a ‘9’. Another possibility is that President Obama, a left-handed 15 year old boy at the time, may have written his own ZIP code in a less-than-fully-legible manner, making the ‘9’ look somewhat like an ‘0’.
In any event, there is no evidence whatever that President Obama’s Social Securiy number was obtained by fraud, identity theft, or any form of deception. Ironically, it is in fact the President whose legally protected and confidential identity records have been tampered with.
http://wiki.obamafringe.com/index.php?title=Social_Security_Number_Theft
If I ever decide to go into the forgery business, I'll keep that in mind.
This should have been treated as if it were a ceremonial document. The whole nine yards, seal and everything. Only the truthers are satisfied.
So far I've not found anything it can't open ~
Solution:
Since Obama has released it, have a trusted person (is there such a thing anymore?) or persons go and look at the original in the book in Hawaii. Take a high resolution picture of it and post the jpeg directly to the internet.
I’m sure there is some statute that they will pull out and say “We would really love to allow this, but the laws prohibit us from doing such a thing” or some other reason we can’t do this.
Besides, the transparency and openness of this administration should be enough for any reasonable person to believe anything they tell us, right? Only a racist would expect any questions about Obama to be cleared up. s/
“Have you examined the issue of his Conn. SS# ?”
I would also like an explanation of that.
But as it stands now, that does not detract from the apparent veracity of this BC.
“It would have been a simple task to take an original BC to the copy machine and run off a few. You and I can do that. Why does Obama find that so difficult.”
This is a ludicrous statement. What would he do with those copies? Walk down to the supermarket and hand them out like flyers?
No, the easiest way to distribute the document to the largest number of people is to make a digital copy and put it on the internet. That requires running it through a scanner.
Now, as far as the manner in which OCR software works as part of the scanning process, your 20+ years should plainly tell you that separating the document into parsable layers is a legitimate processing step. I don’t know what software package they were using, but if I had written OCR software, that could very be the strategy I employed.
And trust me - I know plenty about digital imaging and OCR. I don’t want to get into an IT credentials pissing match, but my team of 30+ developers and I could write that software easily if we weren’t engaged in other endeavors.
I’m looking at 2 birth certificates, one from the 1950’s and one from the 1960’s; both are certified copies with the hospital seal. The whole tab theory falls apart when I look at the one from the 1960’s. There are no less than 6 places where if tab stops were used, words would line up, but they don’t.
This is a ludicrous statement. What would he do with those copies? Walk down to the supermarket and hand them out like flyers?
um... no, he would show it to us... like at the press conference...
or scan THAT ONE and email it, like I have done a thousand times... are you really this obtuse? or just an idiot?
Someone help me here- is bolo a troll?
What we need to see is if an original exists. We dont care to see the 'abstract' manufactured file. I doubt more and more that it does exist.
And as for your 30+ developers- you are full of shit. You obviously know nothing about imaging or OCR.
We didnt need OCR - we needed a simple, single layer photocopy. This is not. It is manufactured from different images.
you are also full, of it-
no one (especially back in the 60’s) CENTERED typed text within boxes.
period.
NO ONE.
But they would have been used in the 60's. This document should have one- but it doesn't, because this is not a document or original BC.
It is a COMPOSITE MANUFACTURED IMAGE.
The constructed document your president presented for your consideration is not a copy of any documentation from the sixties, it is a fabrication which Hawaii has vouched for.
If you want to trust the proven liars in Hawaii and the commie scum soiling the oval office, that's fine, you're entitled to your sycophantic opinion. But don't try to shame others for not accepting the criminal behavior of your president and his criminal minions.
People like you watched sinkEmperor clinton shake his finger in your face and lie to you with anger, and you did as you were told, you sat down and shut up while he continued to destroy YOUR REPUBLIC. well, step aside, feckless, there are others who can chew gum and walk, and will beable to address more than one issue simultaneously.
Go back to being programmed by the CNN liars like John Klein and the MSNBC tinglers like Chrissy Matthews. But please, shut the hell up at Freerepublic when you feel the urge to expose your feckless mental state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.