Explain then why "Kapiolani" is very slightly misaligned with the "Maternity & Gynecological Hospital" typewritten text which follows it. "Kapiolani" also appears to be straight, but dips slightly at the left, as if a typist was attempting to make it appear to have been following the form's curve which resulted from copying from a book. (You may need to expand the PDF to 400% or 600% and use a straightedge aligned with the serifs on the bottom of the typewritten text to see this.) Either "Kapiolani" was typed on a different manual typewriter or the typist, after typing "Kapiolani", released the carriage tension and minutely moved the form down before typing the rest of the line.
"BARACK", similarly, is noticeably lower than "HUSSEIN" and "OBAMA" typewritten further along in the same box. Again, "BARACK" was either typed at a different time on the same or a different typewriter, or the typeist adjusted the form in the carriage after typeing "BARACK".
I'm no documents expert, but I typed tens of thousands of army forms with manual typewriters while in the service, and anyone who has had a similar mind-numbing experience can easily recognize a form which was being very carefully moved around in the carriage as it was being typed, very likely in order to appear to follow the slight curvature of the form resulting from the copying on the platen of a copier from a large book. Very carefully, but not carefully enough.
I can understand different boxes on the form being typed at different times, on different typewriters, and by different typists. Indeed, I often comnpleted or added to forms started in different offices. But why would "Kapiolani" be typed at a different time than "Maternity & Gynecologal Hospital", and "BARACK" typed at a different time than "HUSSEIN" and "OBAMA"?
I'm increasing convinced that we will have to defeat this useless moron on other issues in 2012, and should be able to do so, but I'm still a skeptic on this BC stuff. Hopefully, in the next few days or weeks we'll hear from some genuine documents experts. Others with the wherewithal (hello, Donald) might also be pursuing other lines of investigation. In a real serious investigation (which this should be), for example, I'd be attempting to see what type of records Kapiolani had of physicians on duty - be interesting, for example, to find that Sinclair was at a medical conference in Los Angeles on August 4 (and incidently, what happened to Dr. West, who according to Snopes was the attending physician?).
Lots of potential angles to pursue. Don't think this is dead. But we need to turn up the pressure on college records and other matters as well. I think this sucker is hiding some really really interesting stuff.
That was on a Royal electric with a wider platen and a couple of gears in the guts to allow the machine the cycle times needed to keep up with me ~ contest deck!
So, what do I remember? Well, you're typing along on some-body's crummy Royal used by 5 or 6 different people per day, for years and years, the paper starts slipping and next thing you know you've typed in a curve. With multipart forms ~ with several sheets ~ that would happen all the time.
Now, sit that same typewriter somewhere in a nurses station in a birthing facility and you'll have baby oil, coffee, talcum powder, and who knows what else floating in, pouring in, smearing in ~ and those pieces of paper of whatever kind will twist, and turn and slide around.
The straightest typing that includes all the information they'd have BEFORE BIRTH is typed on a different machine from the one recording information they'd have AFTER BIRTH. That material is straighter and could have been added in from a worksheet ~ although one of our analysts says there's a suggestion that someone with oil or serum on their hand did handle the form. For all we know this thing could have been sitting there beside the mother during the birth. There's another thing taking place we don't see here ~ the taking of the footprints and the baby crying and peeing all over the place. It's possible we could get a DNA sample from any bodily fluid residues and match that up with Obama!
Understanding the ordinary quality of individuals brought in with the Obama Regime there's no way they suspected "THE ONE" would be subjected to such in depth scrutiny. They can't even imagine it after they've been told.
I can see Gibbs in my minds eye trying to put down the idea of checking some of Obama's infant urine residue for DNA ~ and that it's possible it could still be around (possibly useful).